[Halld-cpp] CPP REST production

[Igal Jaegle]

PERLMUTTER is down due to a maintenance day. But tomorrow I can grab the other logs.

tks ig.
________________________________
From: Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 10:32 AM
To: Igal Jaegle <ijaegle at jlab.org>; halld-cpp at jlab.org <halld-cpp at jlab.org>
Cc: Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu>; Sean Dobbs <sdobbs at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: CPP REST production


Hi Igal,

This failure rate is pretty bad. Can you point me to the log files of the failed jobs? The messages you sent concerning root dictionaries and ps_counts_thresholds are not fatal, they will not cause a failures. You should still confirm with Sasha if the ps_counts_thresholds are important.


The file /work/halld/home/gxproj4/public/ForAlexAndSean/std.out seems to be cut off. We may want to add this option to the config file to remove the number of processed events:


JANA:BATCH_MODE 1


You can find my output files here: /work/halld2/home/aaustreg/Analysis/cpp/REST/

I don't have the logs, but all files were closed at exactly the same time.


Cheers,

Alex




On 6/26/24 08:59, Igal Jaegle wrote:
Alex,

Could you provide the path to your output files and most importantly the logs?

The results of the test on NERSC for the same run are as follows

108 evio files were cooked properly out of 126, thus 15% failure rate which is way too much to proceed with the cooking.

tks ig.
________________________________
From: Alexander Austregesilo <aaustreg at jlab.org><mailto:aaustreg at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 6:06 PM
To: halld-cpp at jlab.org<mailto:halld-cpp at jlab.org> <halld-cpp at jlab.org><mailto:halld-cpp at jlab.org>
Cc: Naomi Jarvis <nsj at cmu.edu><mailto:nsj at cmu.edu>; Igal Jaegle <ijaegle at jlab.org><mailto:ijaegle at jlab.org>; Sean Dobbs <sdobbs at jlab.org><mailto:sdobbs at jlab.org>
Subject: CPP REST production

Dear Colleagues,

I processed one single file of a typical CPP production run on Pb
target. Here is a list of all files and their sizes which will be
produced suring the REST prodution:

1.7G hd_rawdata_101586_000.ps.evio
1.2G dana_rest.hddm
495M hd_rawdata_101586_000.ctof.evio
160M hd_rawdata_101586_000.cpp_2c.evio
115M hd_rawdata_101586_000.random.evio
  93M tree_PSFlux.root
  90M hd_rawdata_101586_000.npp_2pi0.evio
  72M hd_rawdata_101586_000.npp_2g.evio
  49M tree_TPOL.root
  42M converted_random.hddm
  41M hd_root.root
  16M hd_rawdata_101586_000.FCAL-LED.evio
  13M hd_rawdata_101586_000.BCAL-LED.evio
1.1M tree_tof_eff.root
164K tree_fcal_hadronic_eff.root
105K hd_rawdata_101586_000.DIRC-LED.evio
105K hd_rawdata_101586_000.CCAL-LED.evio
  94K hd_rawdata_101586_000.sync.evio
  24K tree_TS_scaler.root
  24K tree_bcal_hadronic_eff.root
  24K syncskim.root

The trigger skims for ps (with thick converter) and ctof are quite
large. Do we actually need them or were they maybe already produced
during the calibration stages?

As far as I understand, Igal has started a test of the REST production
at NERSC. We are getting closer to launch!

Cheers,

Alex





--
Alexander Austregesilo

Staff Scientist - Experimental Nuclear Physics
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Newport News, VA
aaustreg at jlab.org<mailto:aaustreg at jlab.org>
(757) 269-6982


--
Alexander Austregesilo

Staff Scientist - Experimental Nuclear Physics
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
Newport News, VA
aaustreg at jlab.org<mailto:aaustreg at jlab.org>
(757) 269-6982

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-cpp/attachments/20240626/77c78257/attachment.html>