[Halld-klf-beam] [EXTERNAL] followup G4 simulations of the KLF beamline

Richard T. Jones richard.t.jones at uconn.edu
Thu Oct 10 18:07:57 EDT 2024


Here are the slides that I shared today, with one adjustment. As requested,
I have updated the left column in the quad-plots for each detector
subsystem to correspond to the rate for the 10cm plug, instead of an
average over all plug thicknesses that many found difficult to interpret.
-Richard Jones

On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 10:39 AM Hovanes Egiyan <hovanes at jlab.org> wrote:

> *Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks a lot for the presentation today, it was extremely useful! Lubomir
> and I just discussed your  presentation. Would you be able to add the 2D
> histograms for FDC where you show the hit number in the  FDC vs FDC layer#
> and anode #wire to the PDF file (you had that in your slides on September
> 6th)? Lubomir would like to see these histograms for the nominal GlueX
> configuration and for KLF with a ~14cm tungsten plug. In both cases, the
> z-axes would need to be the number of FDC hits in a wire per 64 ns burst
> for the comparison to be valid. The worry here is that the average hit rate
> per FDC layer shown on the 1D histograms may not represent at all the
> occupancy for the wires near the beam pipe.
>
> Thanks,
> Hovanes.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Hovanes Egiyan <hovanes at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2024 5:15 PM
> *To:* Richard T. Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
> *Cc:* halld-klf-beam at jlab.org <halld-klf-beam at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] followup G4 simulations of the KLF beamline
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> we would love to see these results tomorrow, if you can connect. We will
> have some other topics to discuss tomorrow before going to GEANT4. But
> drive safely, there is going to be a meeting next week too, if you do not
> make it on time.
>
> Thanks,
> Hovanes.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Richard T. Jones <richard.t.jones at uconn.edu>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 9, 2024 5:08 PM
> *To:* Hovanes Egiyan <hovanes at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* halld-klf-beam at jlab.org <halld-klf-beam at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] followup G4 simulations of the KLF beamline
>
> Hello Hovanes,
>
> I have completed the two assigned tasks from last week:
>
>    1. comparison with GlueX phase II rates
>    2. simulation without the conical extension on the start counter.
>
> and the results are prepared for presentation. We are driving to Boston
> for the last day of DNP tomorrow morning, and expect to arrive sometime
> around 9:00 if the traffic is not too crazy. I will try to connect if I can
> get there in time for the meeting.
>
> -Richard Jones
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-klf-beam/attachments/20241010/f0b3d8a9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: KLF beam simulation detector hits 10-17-2024.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 1999019 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-klf-beam/attachments/20241010/f0b3d8a9/attachment-0001.pdf>


More information about the Halld-klf-beam mailing list