[Halld-offline] [EXTERNAL] Re: Monitoring Launch 2019-11 ver07
Sean Dobbs
sdobbs at fsu.edu
Wed Mar 18 11:52:11 EDT 2020
For most of the runs, the PS is 2 ns off, so that probably affects
these distributions.
---Sean
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 11:38 AM zihlmann <zihlmann at jlab.org> wrote:
>
> Looking at the Beam accidental scaling histograms the lower two histograms
> do not look ok for all runs but run 71761. The energy difference peaks for
> the prompt hits are far too small! As if we lose most of the events.
> again only run 71761 looks right.
>
> On 3/18/20 8:33 AM, Alexander Austregesilo wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We just completed a monitoring launch over the first part of the Spring 2020 data set. We used the latest halld_recon, tagged 'offmon-2019_11-ver07', to run over the first 5 files of each run in the range 71336 - 71800, selected with "@is_dirc_production and status!=0". More information about the conditions of the 267 runs can be found here:
>
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki-private/index.php/Spring_2020_Dataset_Summary
>
> The usual monitoring plots can be found on the web pages:
>
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/data_monitoring/Plot_Browser.html
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/cgi-bin/data_monitoring/monitoring/runBrowser.py
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/cgi-bin/data_monitoring/monitoring/versionBrowser.py
>
> The merged histogram files can be found on the work disk at:
> /work/halld/data_monitoring/RunPeriod-2019-11/mon_ver07/rootfiles/
>
> The REST files, random trigger skims and several trees are saved on cache:
> /cache/halld/offline_monitoring/RunPeriod-2019-11/ver07/REST/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline
More information about the Halld-offline
mailing list