[Halld-offline] Monitoring Launch 2019-11 ver07

[zihlmann]

Looking at the Beam accidental scaling histograms the lower two histograms
do not look ok for all runs but run 71761. The energy difference peaks for
the prompt hits are far too small! As if we lose most of the events.
again only run 71761 looks right.

On 3/18/20 8:33 AM, Alexander Austregesilo wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We just completed a monitoring launch over the first part of the 
> Spring 2020 data set. We used the latest halld_recon, tagged 
> 'offmon-2019_11-ver07', to run over the first 5 files of each run in 
> the range 71336 - 71800, selected with "@is_dirc_production and 
> status!=0". More information about the conditions of the 267 runs can 
> be found here:
>
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki-private/index.php/Spring_2020_Dataset_Summary
>
> The usual monitoring plots can be found on the web pages:
>
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/data_monitoring/Plot_Browser.html
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/cgi-bin/data_monitoring/monitoring/runBrowser.py
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/cgi-bin/data_monitoring/monitoring/versionBrowser.py 
>
>
> The merged histogram files can be found on the work disk at:
> /work/halld/data_monitoring/RunPeriod-2019-11/mon_ver07/rootfiles/
>
> The REST files, random trigger skims and several trees are saved on 
> cache:
> /cache/halld/offline_monitoring/RunPeriod-2019-11/ver07/REST/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Halld-offline mailing list
> Halld-offline at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-offline

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/halld-offline/attachments/20200318/de3b277e/attachment-0002.html>