[Halld-online] Online meeting Jan 29, 2014

[Alexander Somov]

Hi David,

I agree, let's discuss it on Wednesday (the communication in
between groups is usually simple as we know who is working
on what)

The number of trigger meetings has some historic background :)
- we have a weekly FE group meetings (Chris) since long time,
   that cover development of trigger boards and firmware development.
- some time ago we set up a trigger commissiong meeting with
   the aim to discuss some technical details/requirements
   with sub-detector representatives (and getting feedback from them)
- and we have a high-level trigger meeting with Justin.

I would not survive more...

Cheers,
       Alex



On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, David Lawrence wrote:

>
> Hi Alex,
>
>   I understand what you are saying. I do have a concern though that the communication between
> the various groups (trigger, DAQ, controls, monitoring) will deteriorate if we do
> decide to give up on the big picture meeting and retreat to small groups with little
> overlap in the people attending them. The bi-weekly collaboration meeting is OK for quick status
> reports, but not appropriate if there is a need for any real discussion.  Breaking things
> apart necessarily creates cracks into which things may fall.
>
>  I don’t want to waste anyone’s time. Let’s have a brief meeting on Wednesday and decide
> then how to move forward. If the Wednesday meeting needs to become something
> more specialized on say DAQ and online monitoring, then we can consider that.
> Perhaps you could also tell us why we need 3 trigger meetings ;)
>
> Regards,
> -David
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Alexander Somov <somov at jlab.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't think that we'll need a global online meeting
>> anymore. At the meeting we had before we were not able
>> to cover all sub-group details (meetings were long and
>> not much helpful for me at least). Status from sub-groups
>> is presented at the GlueX meeting anyway.
>>
>> We already have several sub-group meetings where
>> technical details are discussed, such as:
>>
>> slow control, 3 trigger meetings, data challenge.
>>
>> It would also make sense to have a local DAQ and Monitoring
>> meetings with experts who are working on these
>> projects.
>>
>> Meetings in small groups (where you discuss technical details)
>> are  usually much more efficient....
>>
>> Cheers,
>>        Alex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, David Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Onliners,
>>>
>>> With the unfortunate and sudden departure of Elliott, several of his projects and responsibilities have been left orphaned and will need to be adopted by other people. We can discuss these and how to move forward at the regularly scheduled Online meeting on Wednesday next week. I have put up a wiki page with a preliminary agenda. If you have anything you'd like to report on or discuss please add it to the agenda or send it me and I'll add it.
>>>
>>> https://halldweb1.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/OWG_Meeting_29-Jan-2014
>>>
>>> Also note that I plan to connect ESnet but if anyone needs a different access method (e.g. SeeVough) let me know ahead of time.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Halld-online mailing list
>>> Halld-online at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-online
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Halld-online mailing list
>> Halld-online at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/halld-online
>
>