[Halld-tracking-hw] CDC Drawings
Curtis A. Meyer
cmeyer at ernest.phys.cmu.edu
Thu Aug 20 14:56:55 EDT 2009
Hi Tim -
can we set up a meeting tomorrow morning at 11:00am to go
over all the drawings. We have a few questions that I will type in
below, and then a number of questions on what certain holes are
for that we can discuss.
FeedThru/Donut:
1) The groove for the glue has been slightly modified. This looks to
be a good design as it avoids the chance of breaking a drill
bit. We
are however worried that the sharp edge will catch on
insertion. Can
we put a champfer on the sharp edge on the grooves on the donuts
and the inserts?
2) The vent hole on the donuts and inserts was increased in size to
0.035.
We originally had it smaller to aid in construction so that it
is obvious
which hole the syringe goes into. They are a too close in
size now to
be able to do that. If it was increased for a manufacturing
reason, then
perhaps we should just make both holes the same size.
Otherwise, we
should shrink the vent back down.
End Plates:
1) One endplate is still labeled as 6mm carbon fiber. This needs to
be fixed.
2) There are several places where 12/24 screws are used. This is a
very odd
size and difficult to get parts for. This should be changed to
a standard
size.
3) The grooves that are used to hold the shells have widths of
0.050 and 0.100
inches. Do you have a suggestion for what we should use in
these. Basically,
we want to discuss the size of these.
4) The upstream endplate has 1 mil tolerances on the survey ball
holes and the
support rods. The down stream has 2mil tolerances. Why the
difference?
5) The holes to attach the bearing blocks seemed to us to be very
odd sizes. Perhaps
the match a known unit, but seeing them as drawn, they seemed
odd. One is
15-thou over a 1/4 and the other is 0.188 inch.
6) It does not appear to us that there are marks on the endplates
to indicate the
first hole in each layer. There is a call-out to the
manufacturer as to which they
are, but it is not obvious that they are marked on the plates.
7) There is probably a good reason for this, but we noted that the
holes for support
standoffs and gas at the outer diameter are placed at four
different radii. The
numerical values for these seem to be random numbers. The
question is can these
be at round "english" numbers.
8) We are not sure what a number of the holes are, but the
twelve 5/16" threaded holes
at 23.15" radius confused us. What are they?
Cheers -- Curtis,
--
Prof. Curtis A. Meyer Department of Physics
Phone: (412) 268-2745 Carnegie Mellon University
Fax: (412) 681-0648 Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
cmeyer at ernest.phys.cmu.edu http://www.curtismeyer.com/
More information about the Halld-tracking-hw
mailing list