[Halld-tracking-hw] CDC Drawings
Tim Whitlatch
whitey at jlab.org
Thu Aug 20 16:03:23 EDT 2009
Hi Curtis,
How about 10:30 tomorrow as Slava has to leave at 11:30? We have answers
(rational or irrational) to all the questions. It is great that the
drawings are being looked at carefully.
Thanks,
Tim
Curtis A. Meyer wrote:
> Hi Tim -
>
> can we set up a meeting tomorrow morning at 11:00am to go
> over all the drawings. We have a few questions that I will type in
> below, and then a number of questions on what certain holes are
> for that we can discuss.
>
> FeedThru/Donut:
>
> 1) The groove for the glue has been slightly modified. This looks to
> be a good design as it avoids the chance of breaking a drill
> bit. We
> are however worried that the sharp edge will catch on
> insertion. Can
> we put a champfer on the sharp edge on the grooves on the donuts
> and the inserts?
>
> 2) The vent hole on the donuts and inserts was increased in size to
> 0.035.
> We originally had it smaller to aid in construction so that it
> is obvious
> which hole the syringe goes into. They are a too close in
> size now to
> be able to do that. If it was increased for a manufacturing
> reason, then
> perhaps we should just make both holes the same size.
> Otherwise, we
> should shrink the vent back down.
>
>
> End Plates:
>
> 1) One endplate is still labeled as 6mm carbon fiber. This needs to
> be fixed.
>
> 2) There are several places where 12/24 screws are used. This is a
> very odd
> size and difficult to get parts for. This should be changed to
> a standard
> size.
>
> 3) The grooves that are used to hold the shells have widths of
> 0.050 and 0.100
> inches. Do you have a suggestion for what we should use in
> these. Basically,
> we want to discuss the size of these.
>
> 4) The upstream endplate has 1 mil tolerances on the survey ball
> holes and the
> support rods. The down stream has 2mil tolerances. Why the
> difference?
>
> 5) The holes to attach the bearing blocks seemed to us to be very
> odd sizes. Perhaps
> the match a known unit, but seeing them as drawn, they seemed
> odd. One is
> 15-thou over a 1/4 and the other is 0.188 inch.
>
> 6) It does not appear to us that there are marks on the endplates
> to indicate the
> first hole in each layer. There is a call-out to the
> manufacturer as to which they
> are, but it is not obvious that they are marked on the plates.
>
> 7) There is probably a good reason for this, but we noted that the
> holes for support
> standoffs and gas at the outer diameter are placed at four
> different radii. The
> numerical values for these seem to be random numbers. The
> question is can these
> be at round "english" numbers.
>
> 8) We are not sure what a number of the holes are, but the
> twelve 5/16" threaded holes
> at 23.15" radius confused us. What are they?
>
> Cheers -- Curtis,
>
>
More information about the Halld-tracking-hw
mailing list