[Halld] GlueX NIM paper available for final inspection / respond by tomorrow Thu at noon

[Elton Smith]

Dear collaborators,

The GlueX NIM draft has been approved by the JLab internal review. 
Please send me any corrections to the current draft by tomorrow at noon. 
I plan to submit the paper to the arXiv tomorrow afternoon.

Thanks, Elton.

Elton Smith
Jefferson Lab MS 12H3
12000 Jefferson Ave STE 4
Newport News, VA 23606
(757)269-7625
(757)269-6331 fax

On 5/26/20 4:02 PM, Elton Smith wrote:
> Dear collaborators,
>
> The GlueX NIM paper "The GlueX Beamline and Detector" is ready for 
> final inspection on DocDB as GlueX-doc-4294-v4 
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/doc-public/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=4294. 
> Please pass this on to any author that might not be on the target mail 
> lists. A summary of the process for producing this document is 
> available on the wiki at 
> https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki-private/index.php/GlueX_NIM_paper_documentation. 
> The Collaboration Review was open for feedback between April 9-27. 
> Comments were collected and tracked via Naomi's web interface at 
> https://gluexweb.jlab.org/author-view-comments-nim-paper. A total of 
> 158 comments were made and most have been implemented in the updated 
> draft. A response to each suggestion is documented on the web 
> interface[Note 1]. Thanks to everyone for your feedback and to the 
> many experts that provided timely updates and responses to the many 
> suggestions.
>
> The current draft has 184 authors, 94 pages, 54 figures, and 95 
> references. This version of the paper has been uploaded to github and 
> the repository 
> https://github.com/JeffersonLab/gluex_documents/tree/master/gluex_nim 
> will contain the authoritative source from now on. The draft on 
> Overleaf is current but may no longer reflect future changes. This 
> draft will be submitted for internal JLab review. After approval we 
> can submit a revised version to the arXiv and Nucl. Instru. and Meth. 
> A with any last-minute corrections.
>
> Thanks to everyone for contributing to this effort and getting us to 
> this point. Elton.
>
>
> [Note 1] Exceptions to the annotations are entries 904-908 because of 
> a bug in the web interface, but all suggestions in that range were 
> implemented.
>