[Hps-analysis] New WABs

[Sho Uemura]

I think we may have screwed up and broken tracking. Should have tested. 
Sorry.

Fixing, will hopefully figure it out today.

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:

> Some pure wab, tritrig, and wab-beam-tri are finishing here, using the new detector and various fixes:
>
>
> /mss/hallb/hps/production/postTriSummitFixes/recon/
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Hps-analysis <hps-analysis-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Bradley T Yale <btu29 at wildcats.unh.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:47:42 PM
> To: Sho Uemura
> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org
> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Unleashing it on the farm.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:24:47 PM
> To: Bradley T Yale
> Cc: Maruyama, Takashi; hps-analysis at jlab.org
> Subject: Re: New WABs
>
> New detectors are ready: HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap,
> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap.
>
> This detector no longer has carbon fiber dipping past the beam plane (the
> "third half-module" that Rafo saw), so WAB conversion rate should be
> correct. None of the active material has moved, so there should be no
> differences visible in reconstruction.
>
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>
>> Making a half-batch of v9 anyway, just in case (as in, they're already in progress...)
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Maruyama, Takashi <tvm at slac.stanford.edu>
>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:41:59 PM
>> To: Uemura, Sho; Bradley T Yale
>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org
>> Subject: RE: New WABs
>>
>> No, I don't think so. No effects on the multiple scattering in the Si layers or ECal flange/crystal.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sho Uemura [mailto:meeg at slac.stanford.edu]
>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:08 AM
>> To: Bradley T Yale
>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Maruyama, Takashi
>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>
>> Takashi - do we need to repeat our studies of the multiple scattering in GEANT4, so we know the differences between 9.6.p01 and 10.x??
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>
>>> Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.
>>>
>>>
>>> NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):
>>>
>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS
>>> -EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio
>>>
>>>
>>> OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):
>>>
>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062
>>> dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio
>>>
>>> Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.
>>>
>>> Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC should be the only difference between them.
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM
>>> To: Bradley T Yale
>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
>>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>>
>>> Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's no problem.
>>>>
>>>> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 vs. 0.0004375 cm).
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM
>>>> To: Bradley T Yale
>>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>>>
>>>> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and
>>>> b factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look
>>>> significantly different.
>>>>
>>>> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's easy.
>>>> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things clearer.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pure WAB:
>>>>>
>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngR
>>>>> un2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WAB with background:
>>>>>
>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tri
>>>>> trigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-f
>>>>> ieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Bradley
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>