[Hps-analysis] New WABs

[Sho Uemura]

Looks OK now. SLIC will have to be rerun.

On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Sho Uemura wrote:

> I think we may have screwed up and broken tracking. Should have tested. 
> Sorry.
>
> Fixing, will hopefully figure it out today.
>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>
>> Some pure wab, tritrig, and wab-beam-tri are finishing here, using the new 
>> detector and various fixes:
>> 
>> 
>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/postTriSummitFixes/recon/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Hps-analysis <hps-analysis-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Bradley T 
>> Yale <btu29 at wildcats.unh.edu>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:47:42 PM
>> To: Sho Uemura
>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org
>> Subject: Re: [Hps-analysis] New WABs
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks a lot.
>> 
>> Unleashing it on the farm.
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:24:47 PM
>> To: Bradley T Yale
>> Cc: Maruyama, Takashi; hps-analysis at jlab.org
>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>> 
>> New detectors are ready: HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap,
>> HPS-PhysicsRun2016-Nominal-v5-0-fieldmap.
>> 
>> This detector no longer has carbon fiber dipping past the beam plane (the
>> "third half-module" that Rafo saw), so WAB conversion rate should be
>> correct. None of the active material has moved, so there should be no
>> differences visible in reconstruction.
>> 
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>> 
>>> Making a half-batch of v9 anyway, just in case (as in, they're already in 
>>> progress...)
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Maruyama, Takashi <tvm at slac.stanford.edu>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 1:41:59 PM
>>> To: Uemura, Sho; Bradley T Yale
>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org
>>> Subject: RE: New WABs
>>> 
>>> No, I don't think so. No effects on the multiple scattering in the Si 
>>> layers or ECal flange/crystal.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Sho Uemura [mailto:meeg at slac.stanford.edu]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 9:08 AM
>>> To: Bradley T Yale
>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Maruyama, Takashi
>>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>> 
>>> Takashi - do we need to repeat our studies of the multiple scattering in 
>>> GEANT4, so we know the differences between 9.6.p01 and 10.x??
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Pure WABs for the new vs. old SLIC/GEANT4 comparison are finishing.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> NEW SLIC (REF/, G4 v. 10.01.p03):
>>>> 
>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_4062dz_HPS
>>>> -EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> OLD SLIC (HEAD/, G4 v. 10.01.p02):
>>>> 
>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_oldG4_10to1_4062
>>>> dz_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*.slcio
>>>> 
>>>> Each represents 10k generated files (0.7 barns), 10to1 readout.
>>>> 
>>>> Both use the updated target thickness (4.062 um), so the version of SLIC 
>>>> should be the only difference between them.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1:02:54 AM
>>>> To: Bradley T Yale
>>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>>> 
>>>> Is it possible to do this with both the old and new SLIC?
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> It's no problem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'll go ahead and make them with the updated target thickness (0.0004062 
>>>>> vs. 0.0004375 cm).
>>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Sho Uemura <meeg at slac.stanford.edu>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 8:24:02 PM
>>>>> To: Bradley T Yale
>>>>> Cc: hps-analysis at jlab.org; Takashi Maruyama
>>>>> Subject: Re: New WABs
>>>>> 
>>>>> The events look fine. Normalization hasn't changed much (Rafo's a and
>>>>> b factors are about the same). Distribution shapes don't look
>>>>> significantly different.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would be good to have a factor of 10 more of the pure WABs, if it's 
>>>>> easy.
>>>>> I don't expect it to tell us anything new but it will make things 
>>>>> clearer.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Bradley T Yale wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unweighted WAB events using the v2 generator have finished recon. 
>>>>>> Everything that contains them are labelled 'wabv2':
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Pure WAB:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/wab/1pt05/wabv2_10to1_HPS-EngR
>>>>>> un2015-Nominal-v4-4-fieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> WAB with background:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /mss/hallb/hps/production/pass6/recon/tritrig-wab-beam-tri/1pt05/tri
>>>>>> trigv1_NOSUMCUT-wabv2-egsv3-triv2-g4v1_HPS-EngRun2015-Nominal-v4-4-f
>>>>>> ieldmap_3.8-fix_pairs1_*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The ones with background also contain tritrig without an ESum generator 
>>>>>> cut, to eliminate possible errors from it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Once Takashi finishes tweaking the egs5 procedure to eliminate WAB 
>>>>>> double-counting, I'll rerun everything along with an updated target 
>>>>>> thickness as well, probably in a fresh directory.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Bradley
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>