[Hps-analysis] HPS Analysis meeting Friday May 6 @ 8am/11am PDT/EDT

[Nelson, Timothy Knight]

So, I should add that Sho is right.  After drawing the tracks and seeing that they were skimming the edge of our acceptance at the back of the tracker, I simply assumed that the deficit in MC was caused by losing them outside our acceptance.  However, the tracks that are lost are the ones that fall *inside* our 6-layer acceptance.  This is even stranger.

Tim

> On May 5, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <mgraham at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> No rest for the weary…we’ll have an analysis meeting tomorrow. 
> 
> Agenda: 
> 
> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/May+6%2C+2016+DAWG+Meeting
> 
> 
> Connection Details: 
> 
> 	• Browser: https://bluejeans.com/722990411
> 	• Phone:  8882402560  722990411  ##  *4
> 
> nb & mg
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis