[Hps-analysis] HPS Analysis meeting Friday May 6 @ 8am/11am PDT/EDT

[Sho Uemura]

It's the ECal electron gap. See attached.

On Fri, 6 May 2016, Nelson, Timothy Knight wrote:

> So, I should add that Sho is right.  After drawing the tracks and seeing that they were skimming the edge of our acceptance at the back of the tracker, I simply assumed that the deficit in MC was caused by losing them outside our acceptance.  However, the tracks that are lost are the ones that fall *inside* our 6-layer acceptance.  This is even stranger.
>
> Tim
>
>> On May 5, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas <mgraham at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> No rest for the weary?we?ll have an analysis meeting tomorrow.
>>
>> Agenda:
>>
>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/May+6%2C+2016+DAWG+Meeting
>>
>>
>> Connection Details:
>>
>> 	? Browser: https://bluejeans.com/722990411
>> 	? Phone:  8882402560  722990411  ##  *4
>>
>> nb & mg
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hps-analysis mailing list
> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smallthetay.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 42310 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160506/6aac0b61/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bigthetay.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 45181 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160506/6aac0b61/attachment-0004.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: thingy.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 44261 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hps-analysis/attachments/20160506/6aac0b61/attachment-0005.pdf>