[Hps-analysis] HPS Analysis meeting Friday May 6 @ 8am/11am PDT/EDT

[Sho Uemura]

(BTW, it shows up in both data and MC - those plots are from data, and 
if you look more closely at Matt's plots you can see the line in both.)

On Fri, 6 May 2016, Sho Uemura wrote:

> It's the ECal electron gap. See attached.
>
> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Nelson, Timothy Knight wrote:
>
>> So, I should add that Sho is right.  After drawing the tracks and seeing 
>> that they were skimming the edge of our acceptance at the back of the 
>> tracker, I simply assumed that the deficit in MC was caused by losing them 
>> outside our acceptance.  However, the tracks that are lost are the ones 
>> that fall *inside* our 6-layer acceptance.  This is even stranger.
>> 
>> Tim
>> 
>>> On May 5, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Graham, Mathew Thomas 
>>> <mgraham at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> No rest for the weary?we?ll have an analysis meeting tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> Agenda:
>>> 
>>> https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/hpsg/May+6%2C+2016+DAWG+Meeting
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Connection Details:
>>>
>>> 	? Browser: https://bluejeans.com/722990411
>>> 	? Phone:  8882402560  722990411  ##  *4
>>> 
>>> nb & mg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>>> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps-analysis mailing list
>> Hps-analysis at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps-analysis
>