[Hps] New HPS-NOTE 2016-002

[Valery Kubarovsky]

Hi All,

We have to avoid the term "sampling fraction" in the calorimeter publications and notes.
This term is applicable only for the sampling calorimeters consisting of absorber sandwiched with an active material which generates signal. We have homogeneous calorimeter in which the entire volume is sensitive. This kind of calorimeter has no sampling fraction or sampling fluctuation (see for example calorimeter review in PDG). I think that using term "sampling fraction" is very confusing in the description of the PbWO4 calorimeter.

Regards,
Valery
  

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stepan Stepanyan" <stepanya at jlab.org>
> To: "Hps at jlab.org" <Hps at jlab.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:52:06 PM
> Subject: [Hps] New HPS-NOTE 2016-002

> Dear all,
> 
> Please checkout a new HPS-NOTE by Holly on ECal calibrations for 2015 data.
> https://misportal.jlab.org/mis/physics/hps_notes/viewFile.cfm/2016-002.pdf?documentId=18
> 
> Regards, Stepan
> _______________________________________________
> Hps mailing list
> Hps at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps