[Hps] New HPS-NOTE 2016-002

[Gabriel CHARLES]

Hi Valery,

   I agree, I will clean the article.
   Quoting the Grupen and Shwartz, Cambridge Monographs, in our case:
"[...] the energy resolution originates from fluctuations of the energy
leakage and from fluctuations of the first interaction point".

"Sampling fraction" will probably become : "ratio of measured and 
reconstructed energy"
Or equivalent according to the context.

The item has been added to the TO DO list for the article so it won't be 
forgotten but it's not an urgent item.

Best regards,
-- 
Gabriel CHARLES
Post-doctorant
Institut de Physique Nucléaire d'Orsay
Contact : (0)(+33)1 69 15 63 02

Le 2016-06-09 16:46, Valery Kubarovsky a écrit :
> Hi All,
> 
> We have to avoid the term "sampling fraction" in the calorimeter
> publications and notes.
> This term is applicable only for the sampling calorimeters consisting
> of absorber sandwiched with an active material which generates signal.
> We have homogeneous calorimeter in which the entire volume is
> sensitive. This kind of calorimeter has no sampling fraction or
> sampling fluctuation (see for example calorimeter review in PDG). I
> think that using term "sampling fraction" is very confusing in the
> description of the PbWO4 calorimeter.
> 
> Regards,
> Valery
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stepan Stepanyan" <stepanya at jlab.org>
>> To: "Hps at jlab.org" <Hps at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:52:06 PM
>> Subject: [Hps] New HPS-NOTE 2016-002
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Please checkout a new HPS-NOTE by Holly on ECal calibrations for 2015 
>> data.
>> https://misportal.jlab.org/mis/physics/hps_notes/viewFile.cfm/2016-002.pdf?documentId=18
>> 
>> Regards, Stepan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hps mailing list
>> Hps at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps