[Hybrid baryons] BSA uncertainties

[Volker Burkert]

It is not good to evaluate dA/A because if A=0 then error always infinite. dA should be evaluated.
V.



On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:51 AM, Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

Please find below the analytical evaluations for BSA uncertainties: a) the absolute uncertainty values \DeltaA (next to bottom string); b) relative \DeltaA/A values (bottom string)

As you may see, the relative DeltaA/A uncertainty is described by the product of two terms. The second (from left to right) term is proportional 1/sqrt(N+-N-), as FX mentioned. However, the first term 1/(N+-N-) inflates DeltaA/A values for A<0.1, which a typical values for the BSA in the N* region. For this reason, statistics matters, in particular in the resonance region where the statistics is much smaller in comparison with the DIS region.

  Best Regards,
                               Victor

________________________________
 From: Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 9:38 AM
To: Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
Subject:



<IMG_0529.JPG>


Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org<mailto:Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hybrid_baryons/attachments/20210205/fd2787c8/attachment.html>