[Hybrid baryons] BSA uncertainties
Viktor Mokeev
mokeev at jlab.org
Fri Feb 5 12:32:31 EST 2021
Dear All,
In response to Volker comment I agree with, the next to the last string in my write up is the evaluation of the uncertainty of A. As I already showed, my and FFX expressions for A uncertainty are identical.
Best Regards,
Victor
________________________________
From: Hybrid_baryons <hybrid_baryons-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Volker Burkert <burkert at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 12:28 PM
To: hybrid_baryons at jlab.org <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Hybrid baryons] BSA uncertainties
It is not good to evaluate dA/A because if A=0 then error always infinite. dA should be evaluated.
V.
On Feb 5, 2021, at 9:51 AM, Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>> wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Please find below the analytical evaluations for BSA uncertainties: a) the absolute uncertainty values \DeltaA (next to bottom string); b) relative \DeltaA/A values (bottom string)
As you may see, the relative DeltaA/A uncertainty is described by the product of two terms. The second (from left to right) term is proportional 1/sqrt(N+-N-), as FX mentioned. However, the first term 1/(N+-N-) inflates DeltaA/A values for A<0.1, which a typical values for the BSA in the N* region. For this reason, statistics matters, in particular in the resonance region where the statistics is much smaller in comparison with the DIS region.
Best Regards,
Victor
________________________________
From: Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 9:38 AM
To: Viktor Mokeev <mokeev at jlab.org<mailto:mokeev at jlab.org>>
Subject:
<IMG_0529.JPG>
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org<mailto:Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hybrid_baryons/attachments/20210205/9a4c3187/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Hybrid_baryons
mailing list