[Isotope-prod] Writing assignments and Outline

[George Neil]

Pavel
I am hoping we will begin to have some answers to those questions on 
Friday and that will be able to better define the scope of what you will 
write about.
George


On 10/26/2015 11:33 AM, Pavel Degtiarenko wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> In the beginning we (George Kharashvili and myself) were trying to 
> cover different isotopes / parent targets / energies / possible target 
> arrangements. Do you think all of that needs to be included in the 
> report.
>
> For example, should we discuss Th-230 target, or it's beyond our 
> reach. If we could find 500g of Th-230, I believe we'd prefer to use 
> it, and wouldn't try to optimize and design the system for Ra-226 
> target. Otherwise, development and optimization of Radium target setup 
> should be done in more detail and we should forget about Th-230.
>
> Similar situation with Cu-67 isotope production. Should we list all 
> the options, including production from Zinc targets, and beam energy 
> optimizations for different possible engineering solutions?
>
> Any hint on the importance / market value of Lu-177. Should we 
> consider its production from Hafnium.
>
> If we start writing now, it seems it will be not a proposal for the 
> isotope production for the market, -- but for isotope production R&D 
> -- and I guess we should avoid that. Could we try to develop a 
> consensus limiting our options.
>
> Regards,
> Pavel
>
>
> On 10/26/2015 10:11 AM, George Neil wrote:
>> We are a month and a week away from producing our final report. 
>> Please start summarizing your results into a coherent WRITTEN 
>> package.   I have produced a DRAFT outline of the final report with a 
>> description of what I expect to see in each section. There are 
>> writing assignments for the lead of each section. Feel free to draw 
>> on others to produce that section but it is your responsibility to 
>> see that it gets done.  Remember that we expect to assemble the 
>> complete package the first week of December so your section needs to 
>> be done before then (and I will be relying on some of your numbers to 
>> produce the final story as to viability so I have to see your story 
>> before I can write my section).   Please review the outline; get back 
>> to me with any suggested changes and, most of all, start writing!
>> George
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Isotope-prod mailing list
>> Isotope-prod at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/isotope-prod
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isotope-prod mailing list
> Isotope-prod at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/isotope-prod

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/isotope-prod/attachments/20151026/38d6b0d1/attachment.html>