[Jef] [EXTERNAL] Re: Abstract for CAP Congress 2021

Susan Schadmand s.schadmand at gmail.com
Wed Feb 24 03:03:36 EST 2021


Dear Jon,

I have some suggestions/comments:

The motivation sounds a bit unfamiliar and readers might not get some of 
the statements, like

  *   'unique combination of additive quantum numbers' and 'relative
    ease of production'
      o My point is that to a more general audience it is not clear what
        you mean here, why is that and what does it do for the cause.

  *   Also, I think it should be 'light quark mass ratio' instead of
    'strange-to-light-quark mass ratio Q'
      o   the strange quark is considered light.

  * In general, the abbreviations BSM, CVPC, and Q are unnecessary here,
    as the text does not use them further.

  * 'The GlueX spectrometer at Je
fferson Lab off
ers a high-statistics
    sample of photoproduced  mesons and a unique degree of forward
    boosting in the lab frame (p ... 8 GeV) to suppress backgrounds.'
      o   You should say a number for the produced/expected eta decays
        when talking about the 'offered' statistics. By offered you mean
        with the present setup?
      o You need to explain: What is unique about the forward boosting?
        Why that suppresses background (btw, a word to be used as a
        singular noun).
      o Again, this sentence does not make it clear what your message is.

  * 'improve the granularity and resolution of the inner forward
    calorimeter to improve sensitivity in key decay channels.'
      o Better to say that this requires the planned upgrade ... Details
        of that do not belong in the abstract.

  * 'the current status of eta detection with the GlueX spectrometer'
      o eta _detection_ cannot be an issue for the GlueX detector. What
        is your message here, what are you actually going to present?

Best,
Su.


On 23.02.21 19:57, Jonathan Zarling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was planning to submit an abstract at the Canadian Association of 
> Physicists virtual congress on JEF physics. Attached is a draft of the 
> abstract, please let me know if you have any thoughts. The deadline is 
> on Feb. 28, I'm also planning to send the abstract out to the GlueX 
> mailing list in a day or so.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jef mailing list
> Jef at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/jef

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/jef/attachments/20210224/f62e73fe/attachment.html>


More information about the Jef mailing list