[Jef] [EXTERNAL] Re: Next JEF meeting: Friday 9/27/24 9:30 am

[Susan Schadmand]

Hi again,

I had entered this as a topic on the meeting page but helas, Liping had 
to leave.

So again, I would like to ask that there is a  discussion resulting in a 
slight update to the standard talk. At the very least, the speakers have 
to be aware and be able to answer questions about the status of the 
simulations and estimates.

This should be discussed before Laveen's practice talk?!

Let me know what you think.

Su.

On 27.09.24 15:16, Susan Schadmand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the workshop in Krakow last week, Bill gave the JEF talk and he did 
> y good job explaining that there are more precise estimates and 
> background studies underway.
>
> Sergi Gonzales-Soli asked about why the sensitivity for B from 
> eta->pi0gg is predicted to be so much better than previous 
> measurements. His argument is, if I understand correctly, that the 
> model by Sean Tulin ignores standard model background.
>
> I told him that the JEF prediction is based on a bump hunt scenario 
> and that I assume that the sensitivity is derived from the 
> reconstruction efficiency from a simulation of the peak without 
> background. And that in my opinion this could be too optimistic.
>
> In the light of further JEF talks, eg Laveen at DNP, can we please 
> discuss all this sometime? His practice talk for DNP is next week, I 
> think on Wednesday.
>
> Thx,
> Su.
>
>
> On 26.09.24 17:34, Simon Taylor via Jef wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>> Our next JEF meeting will be tomorrow at 9:30 am JLab time.
>> Meeting page:
>> https://halldweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/JEF_meeting,_September_27,_2024
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jef mailing list
>> Jef at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/jef
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/jef/attachments/20240927/843b7ba7/attachment.html>