[Moller_L2] OPA vs Director's Review Charge memos

[James Fast]

Folks,
I just got the January OPA review charge memo from DOE today.  There are very few differences from the Director’s Review charge.
The OPA charge questions are below with the only substantive addition highlighted.  This one item is something Lisa and I will deal with – in fact we discussed just this issue earlier today.

In carrying out its charge, the review panel is requested to consider the following main topics:

  1.  Is the project team effectively executing the work? Are technical issues appropriately and proactively being addressed? Are the proposed CD-3A long-lead procurements appropriate?
  2.  Are the cost and schedule estimates credible? Do they include adequate scope, cost, and schedule contingency? Are the estimates for the proposed CD-3A long-lead procurements appropriate and can these procurements be properly tracked?
  3.  Is environment, safety, and health (ES&H) and quality being properly addressed given the project’s current stage of development?
  4.  Is the project being properly managed? Are risks being effectively managed? Is the management team in place to successfully execute the CD-3A scope?
  5.  Is the project appropriately addressing the recommendations from the prior DOE SC reviews?
  6.  Is the project ready for CD-3A approval?


James Fast
MOLLER Project Manager
Jefferson Lab
757-230-6833 (cell)
757-269-5324 (office)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/moller_l2/attachments/20221018/b8089f44/attachment.html>