[Moller_L2] [EXTERNAL] Re: MOLLER review schedule

[Michael Gericke]

This is a Director's review. Is that not scheduled by the lab?

Michael

On 2022-09-21 10:25 a.m., Krishna Kumar wrote:
> *Caution:* This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba.
>
>
> HI, Michael. It is dictated by the dates already set for the CD3A and 
> CD 2 reviews and working backwards. I can explain separately on the 
> phone.
>
> We dont get much flexibility when dealing with DOE; they have their 
> own constraints. And we are trying to keep the ultimate goal in mind 
> for when we want to be ready to do physics.
>
> Anyway, let us chat about this on the phone at a convenient time.
>
> Cheers,
> KK
>
>
>> On Sep 21, 2022, at 11:22 AM, Michael Gericke 
>> <Michael.Gericke at umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Hi KK,
>>
>> I don't need help navigating the reviews. I just need there to be a 
>> more inclusive approach to scheduling these meetings.
>>
>> Perhaps there could be more of an effort to consult people, before 
>> scheduling meetings? What is the hangup about having the review in 
>> early December (it is not holiday period in the first two weeks of 
>> December).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On 2022-09-21 10:11 a.m., Krishna Kumar wrote:
>>> *Caution:* This message was sent from outside the University of 
>>> Manitoba.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, Michael. Jim is trying to navigate to a very complicated set of 
>>> constraints to get us to the schedule we want for CD-3A and CD-2 
>>> approval, which is in turn critical to have us doing physics by the 
>>> end of 2025.
>>>
>>> I know this is going to be extraordinarily challenging and we will 
>>> try to help you as much as possible to navigate the relevant reviews 
>>> for the detectors while also participating in the test beam. We can 
>>> discuss this in more detail at our next regular meetings or in 
>>> separate chats.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> KK
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 21, 2022, at 11:07 AM, Michael Gericke 
>>>> <Michael.Gericke at umanitoba.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why can't it be moved to early December? Is it strictly necessary 
>>>> to have a Director's review every time we have a CD review? There 
>>>> are too many meetings and too little time to actually do the work 
>>>> we are getting reviewed about.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> On 2022-09-21 10:05 a.m., James Fast wrote:
>>>>> *Caution:*This message was sent from outside the University of 
>>>>> Manitoba.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael,
>>>>> I realize that many of these dates are not trivial to manage but 
>>>>> there is not a better option that gets us to CD-3a review in 
>>>>> January given the holidays.
>>>>> James Fast
>>>>> MOLLER Project Manager
>>>>> Jefferson Lab
>>>>> 757-230-6833 (cell)
>>>>> 757-269-5324 (office)
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:*Moller_L2<moller_l2-bounces at jlab.org>on behalf of Michael 
>>>>> Gericke<Michael.Gericke at umanitoba.ca>
>>>>> *Date:*Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 11:02 AM
>>>>> *To:*moller_l2 at jlab.org<moller_l2 at jlab.org>
>>>>> *Subject:*[Moller_L2] [EXTERNAL] Re: MOLLER review schedule
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>
>>>>> The directors review is right before now scheduled beam test in 
>>>>> Mainz. It is a very inconvenient time for that review! It will be 
>>>>> hard enough to prepare (again on such short notice) for the beam 
>>>>> test without then to also having to worry about the review.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2022-09-21 9:42 a.m., James Fast wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     *Caution:*This message was sent from outside the University of
>>>>>     Manitoba.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Now with attachment
>>>>>     James Fast
>>>>>     MOLLER Project Manager
>>>>>     Jefferson Lab
>>>>>     757-230-6833 (cell)
>>>>>     757-269-5324 (office)
>>>>>
>>>>>     *From:*James Fast<jfast at jlab.org> <mailto:jfast at jlab.org>
>>>>>     *Date:*Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:05 AM
>>>>>     *To:*MOLLER L2<moller_l2 at jlab.org>
>>>>>     <mailto:moller_l2 at jlab.org>, Ernest E Ihloff<eihloff at mit.edu>
>>>>>     <mailto:eihloff at mit.edu>, James E Kelsey<jkelsey at mit.edu>
>>>>>     <mailto:jkelsey at mit.edu>
>>>>>     *Subject:*MOLLER review schedule
>>>>>
>>>>>     L2 and CAMs,
>>>>>     Attached are a few slides with the proposed schedule of
>>>>>     activities for our various upcoming reviews.  Please plan
>>>>>     accordingly.  I realize it is quite a busy schedule, but it is
>>>>>     the final push to get to constructing MOLLER.
>>>>>     Jim
>>>>>     James Fast
>>>>>     MOLLER Project Manager
>>>>>     Jefferson Lab
>>>>>     757-230-6833 (cell)
>>>>>     757-269-5324 (office)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>     Moller_L2 mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>>     Moller_L2 at jlab.org
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/moller_l2
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Moller_L2 mailing list
>>>> Moller_L2 at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/moller_l2
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/moller_l2/attachments/20220921/bdcc1e28/attachment-0001.html>