[Mott] [EXTERNAL] RE: status update

[Xavier Roca Maza]

Dear all,

the most suitable section would be Electroweak Interactions in my opinion.
The other two options mentioned before refer to reactions in which the
strong interaction is involved.

I would be ok with the upload to arxiv.org but I have no strong preference
on that.
Best regards,
Xavier

El mar., 11 feb. 2020 19:25, Timothy Gay <tgay at unl.edu> escribió:

> Hi Joe,
>
>
>
> Question # 3: I think Relativistic Nuclear Collisions is more
> appropriate.  Or, possibly Electroweak Interactions? Nuclear Reactions is,
> like Be + Li -> 3 He or something.
>
>
>
> I am agnostic on the arXiv.
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> *From:* Mott <mott-bounces at jlab.org> *On Behalf Of *Joe Grames
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2020 11:59 AM
> *To:* mott at jlab.org
> *Subject:* [Mott] status update
>
>
>
> Dear Mott Team,
>
>
>
> Thanks for Charlie, Tim, Matt, Marcy for their edits.
>
>
>
> All comments received to Sections 1-8, and 10 are addressed.   I do not
> expect any new comments to these sections.
>
>
>
> What's left?
>
>    1. Charlie, need your remaining comments to Section 9 (Pade) or 11
>    (Conclusions).
>    2. Although relatively few edits to version #8, I'll circulate a final
>    copy as soon as ready.
>    3. Do we agree on the following?   * Journal = Phys. Rev. C, Type =
>    Regular Article,  Section=Nuclear reactions*
>    4. Are we submitting to *arXiv* as well?   We can't change after
>    starting.  If YES, need to do this first, get ID
>
> Joe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mott mailing list
> Mott at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/mott
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/mott/attachments/20200211/f01b7516/attachment.html>