[Pansophy] Traveler Question

[Valerie Bookwalter]

Not necessary for only 3 inspections. If all 160 were going through CMM then a separate traveler would be needed.

From: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 10:17 AM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Traveler Question

Hi Valerie,

I am making a traveler for the FPC Waveguides for HE. The traveler involves inspections that are nearly all done by the CMA staff. However, there is one step that involves some CMM inspections; this inspection will be carried out on 3 out of 160 units. I know that we are meant to separate travelers by workstation; in this case, is it worthwhile making a separate traveler for the CMM on just these few units, or should I keep it a step in the general inspection traveler?

Thanks,
Naeem

Naeem Huque
Staff Engineer
Superconducting Radiofrequency (SRF)
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News
VA, 23606
Cell: 217-721-5422
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210126/3e198cd8/attachment.html>