[Pansophy] L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R2

[Allen Samuels]

Tiffany,

Thanks for the confirmation. I've removed the R2 from the masterlist. If this changes, let me know. Just so you are aware, I will be making a small change to the current L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF traveler. During my research, I realized that the procedure linked in the references was a word doc, when we generally use PDFs. This is an easy fix and doesn't require a new version since it's the same document, just in a different format.

Allen

From: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 10:50 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R2

Hi Allen,

I agree and am confused as well.  In my notes I also show a R2 for this procedure but see no mention of it in my meeting notes or emails.  I suspect that I made a mistake writing the revision since we were revising the L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF traveler and the C100R-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF procedure at the same time as we were working the L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF procedure.  My notes also indicate that at least I believe we are done with the L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF procedure and no R2 is being worked currently.  I think that this procedure should be L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R1 and any mention of an R2 for this procedure at this point can be removed.

Since Christiana is listed as the author of this procedure, I've added her to this email so that she can chime in and correct my above statement if needed.

Tiffany Ganey

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 10:34 AM
To: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org<mailto:ganey at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R2

Tiffany,

While I was going over the L2HE masterlist to prepare the L2HE meeting status sheet, I ran into something confusing. The L2HE-PR-VTA-CAV-VTRF procedure was marked as an R2, and that a new revision was out for approval. To the best of my knowledge and searching, however, I haven't been able to find any other mention of the new revision. Do you know if I am missing something here, or did I accidentally mark the procedure as having a new revision when it was only the traveler?

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20211012/a051d9a2/attachment.html>