[Pansophy] NCR R13

[Jacob Harris]

Valerie,
The NCR form is a document that falls under the NCR Process - similar to the procedure that falls under your records process. The approval for all other QMS docs is the author/creator (Process Owner), QA Rep, and Tony. Where I am the author/creator, I ask Anne to be the QA Rep. For the NCR form, I am trying to be consistent, even though a Pansophy form has obvious differences to a word file.

Production travelers list Approval Titles as content author, reviewers, and Project Manager - no Pansophy Team. Are you trying to capture the review of the hand coding in the NCR traveler? When I talked to Megan, I thought that her/you as author, me as reviewer, Anne as QA Rep, and Tony made it closely resemble the other QMS docs and acknowledges the contribution of the Pansophy Team.

Jacob

From: Valerie Bookwalter
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 12:58 PM
To: Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: NCR R13
Importance: High

Jacob,

What is this about?
Why are you suddenly so interested in changing all the reviewer names on the NCR code?

Is this because you are the NCR Process Owner?
However, you are not writing the code for NCRs. You are giving us specifications/requirements.

Please understand. The review is not just about your procedure, but also all the hand coding that goes into the NCR process.

If you still feel that you must dictate the reviewer names then I must ask that Tony give approval.

Valerie Bookwalter
Jefferson Lab, SRF Department
Pansophy Team
1-757-269-5802 (OFFICE - currently working offsite)




________________________________
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> on behalf of Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org<mailto:jharris at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 12:45 PM
To: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org> <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] NCR R13

Inventory participates to some extent with NCRs, but the NCR  or Doc Mgmt procedures don't require an INV review. That said, extra reviewers are fine. On other documents in my ISO processes I have used Anne as the QA Rep to keep separation of responsibilities. I assume you are limited to 4 people in the signature block?

Jacob
________________________________
From: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 12:20:29 PM
To: Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org<mailto:jharris at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org> <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>
Subject: NCR R13


Jacob,



After discussing with Valerie, this is the approval names we have decided on

Author - Me or Valerie as we write and make changes

Inv Reviewer - Mike Dickey for the tags

QA Rep - Jacob

SRF Dept Head - Tony

[cid:image003.jpg at 01D84F31.1A6F8E60]



Megan McDonald

Office - (757) 269-7641

Cell - (757) 234-1604


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220413/973d2603/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32606 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220413/973d2603/attachment-0001.jpg>