[Pansophy] C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2

[Valerie Bookwalter]

No

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> On Behalf Of Mike Drury via Pansophy
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 11:38 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: Mike McCaughan <michaelm at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2

Step 39 is indeed necessary.
Does fixing the numbering require another approval cycle?
Mike

On 1/25/2023 11:32 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
Mike,

C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2 has been approved, but Mike McCaughan brought something up in an approval comment that I wanted to ask about. He said

“Numbering of steps missed a block on page 4 between steps 11/12; revise present step 13 for corrected numbering.

Is step 39 on page 14 necessary? In order to conduct the test it is implicit that facility has a present/valid PSS static and functional certification which wrings all of this out of the system.”

Are these changes that need to be made? Does this traveler need to be put on pause to discuss?



Allen



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230125/19b858b2/attachment.html>