[Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs

[Liang Zhao]

Got it, thanks, Valerie. Let me know if I need to do anything later on.

Thanks,
Liang
________________________________
From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:46 PM
To: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs


Liang,



No, no more data for C100. We should bring the FPFT C100 traveler forward to C100R.



Allen,



Please assist in getting this done.



Mike,



Please verify FPFTSNs in traveler database.



Thanks



Valerie





From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> On Behalf Of Valerie Bookwalter via Pansophy
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:44 PM
To: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs







From: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org<mailto:lzhao at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:09 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Subject: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs



Hi Valerie,



We bought 20 spare field probe feedthroughs for C100R last year. They went through inspection cycle and are stored at inventory for future use.



There is no insp traveler for FPFT in C100R currently. During C100 time, this traveler was used only a few times because the feedthroughs were likely sampled during inspection.



If I want to store the inspection information for these feedthroughs in Pansophy, is it okay to put it in C100 project? Or should I have it in C100R project?



Thanks,

Liang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230301/3246cbe2/attachment-0001.html>