[Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs
Allen Samuels
samuels at jlab.org
Mon Mar 6 09:32:56 EST 2023
Liang,
I have copied the old C100 traveler over to the latest template for you. It still needs NCR/D3 emails and approval names, but otherwise should be good. Please review the document and make any changes and additions necessary, and put it in the ready for approvals folder when it is ready. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out.
Allen
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> On Behalf Of Liang Zhao via Pansophy
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 4:48 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs
Got it, thanks, Valerie. Let me know if I need to do anything later on.
Thanks,
Liang
________________________________
From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:46 PM
To: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org<mailto:lzhao at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs
Liang,
No, no more data for C100. We should bring the FPFT C100 traveler forward to C100R.
Allen,
Please assist in getting this done.
Mike,
Please verify FPFTSNs in traveler database.
Thanks
Valerie
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Valerie Bookwalter via Pansophy
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:44 PM
To: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] FW: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs
From: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org<mailto:lzhao at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 3:09 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Subject: Inspection traveler for spare C100 field probe feedthroughs
Hi Valerie,
We bought 20 spare field probe feedthroughs for C100R last year. They went through inspection cycle and are stored at inventory for future use.
There is no insp traveler for FPFT in C100R currently. During C100 time, this traveler was used only a few times because the feedthroughs were likely sampled during inspection.
If I want to store the inspection information for these feedthroughs in Pansophy, is it okay to put it in C100 project? Or should I have it in C100R project?
Thanks,
Liang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230306/5337666f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: C100R-INSP-FPFT-R1.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 353049 bytes
Desc: C100R-INSP-FPFT-R1.docx
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230306/5337666f/attachment-0001.docx>
More information about the Pansophy
mailing list