[Pansophy] Updates to C75 Pair CMM/Inspection Traveler needed

[Matt Weaks]

Hi Anne,

I would suggest Aaron or Earl be listed as Author, with the other serving as Reviewer 1 in their capacity as SME, yourself as Reviewer 2/WCL, and Tony as the final signatory.

Those 4 signatures should cover the requirement for the new protocols, though I would suggest the traveler be circulated among all listed parties (Especially Danny and John) for comment prior to uploading to Docushare/Pansophy.  As the "Customer" they have a vested interest in ensuring the traveler collects the data they require and should have input in its creation, but I believe Aaron and Earl serve as SME based on knowledge of the process and experience with the equipment.

For the remaining fields, I believe the existing NCR Dispositioners (Danny/John/Gigi) are accurate, though I would update the NCR Informative to be yourself, Kirk and Tony.

Hope that helps, and please let me know if I can answer anything else,

Thanks,
-Matt

From: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:25 AM
To: Matt Weaks <weaksmc at jlab.org>
Cc: John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>; SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org) <pansophy at jlab.org>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org>
Subject: Updates to C75 Pair CMM/Inspection Traveler needed

Hi Matt

I address this note to you since you are the Project Coordinator for C75. I understand you are reviewing the Traveler "Master List" .

We believe some changes/updates will be needed to the CMM/Inspection traveler for C75 , so under the new rules for authors/reviewers need to know how you want to proceed

Background :   In the past we have checked C75 Pairs on CMM1 , where two set ups were needed because the machine was under sized for the job.  This week  Earl Mosby is programing CMM2 - a much larger machine where only one set up will be needed. We could imagine in future we would mainly use CMM2 for C75 Pairs, although if a large job is on CMM2 (like the 80- inch EIC cavity ), we may have reasons to use CMM1 for Pairs still in future , so will want to keep both machines with full capability to do pairs . At the end of the day, regardless of which machine is used, the output measurements will be the same for the end user

So - my question is  who should author, review and approve under the new Protocols ? The experts on the CMM program, are Aaron & Earl (both should at least review the traveler)  , the end "customer" likely is John Fischer and Danny . I am the WC Lead, and Tony is the Dept. manager

So I am thinking Aaron and Earl should be author and first reviewer, as they will have the most input ?

I understand from Tiffany it is possible to CC others for information- so am thinking definitely John Fischer needs to be on distribution so he is  aware of the changes and can comment  , perhaps Danny & others as well ?

Under the new protocol my understand is that the WC Lead (me) and Dept. Manager need to approve as well - Unfortunately there are only 4 signatures allowed -

I expect we will want to start changes after the Thanksgiving break while they are still fresh in everyone's mind , so could you let us know how we should proceed

Thanks Anne



_______________________________________________________________________________
E. Anne McEwen
JSA / Jefferson Lab
SRF Institute
Newport News, VA 23606
Office: +1 (757) 269-5539
Email:   mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20231121/6b61f632/attachment.html>