[Pansophy] Fwd: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Tue Sep 5 13:54:49 EDT 2023

FYI...

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 12:34:54 PM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>; Chase Dubbe <cdubbe at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Katherine, et. al.,

A quick summary of my conversation with Chase. There are three phases to APS Magnet work.

Phase 1 Receive Girders. A cursory inspection for shipping damage just to let Argonne or the shipping company know. There isn’t any quality issues or data to collect; therefore no QA/QC forms or records need to be created. The Pansophy traveler can track progress, but it’s probably overkill. A table with girder ID and a few additional columns is enough for the CAM to track progress.

Phase 2 Disassemble Girders. There are ESH/RAD issues and the activity will need a detailed work instruction – to be developed with the first one or two disassembles. There isn’t any quality issues or data to collect so no QA/QC forms or records need to be created. The Pansophy traveler can track progress, but it’s probably overkill. A table with Girder ID, Magnet ID, disassembly status, and a few additional columns is enough for the CAM to track progress.

Phase 3 Test magnets. Time for QA/QC. Need to determine acceptance criteria – should be a joint document with BNL. Need to write work instructions for the inspections - JLab docs. Need to capture inspection/test results. Pansophy traveler works well for data capture, especially if there are many tests. Need to determine end-item documentation format – report form, export of structured data, or spreadsheet table. Phase 3 will start no earlier than 12-14 from now (in FY25).

Regarding BNL’s traveler system, there is no question that SRF will continue to use Pansophy for SRF work. I think Chase is referring to an open question about using the BNL e-traveler system for the Phase 3 magnet work. BNL is doing the same work on other APS magnets from Argonne so it might be simpler to let Chase enter test/inspection data directly into BNLs traveler system. Because Phase 3 won’t start before FY25, there is time for Chase to see how BNL’s traveler system works before making a decision.

Chase, I am speaking for you, so please correct anything I got wrong or that has changed since our conversation.

Jacob

From: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 11:24 AM
To: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>; Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Hi Tony and Valerie,

Adding Jacob, who has been discussing this with Chase.

  1.   All SRF work will use SRF processes, including Pansophy.  Data will presumably be transferred to BNL using a system generally similar to what was done on PPU, HE, etc.

  1.  For magnet work only, there had been discussion of using Pansophy.  I believe BNL asked whether it would be easier to use their traveler system, so our magnets and their magnets would be in the same system.  Maybe Jacob can summarize the status.
Thanks,
Katherine
________________________________
From: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 10:44 AM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Hi Valerie,

I know nothing about this. As for SRF Ops, our Traveler system is deeply imbedded in our ISO QMS. Several of our ISO processes are reliant on our Traveler system. Changing to a different system will require us to revamp our processes which in my view would put recertification at risk.

I do hope we do not end up in a situation where we need to translate or manually transfer our data into another system.

Thanks,
Tony

________________________________
From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 10:02 AM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Cc: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>
Subject: FW: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

FYI…

What do you know about this?

What traveler system?

Valerie

From: Chase Dubbe <cdubbe at jlab.org<mailto:cdubbe at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 4:17 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Cc: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Good afternoon Valerie,

This effort is currently on hold right now, as EIC project management is currently working with Brookhaven to discuss using one traveler system between the two labs. The plan being that the data would be easily transitioned from our database to theirs. Once I know more, I will let you know, but unfortunately, I am on hold until I hear what their choice is.

Thank you,

Chase

________________________________

From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 1:14 PM
To: Chase Dubbe <cdubbe at jlab.org<mailto:cdubbe at jlab.org>>
Cc: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Subject: FW: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Chase,

Are we still working on this? We should meet and get this moving forward.

Thanks.

Valerie

From: Chase Dubbe <cdubbe at jlab.org<mailto:cdubbe at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 3:13 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Subject: APS Girders - Pansophy Traveler

Good Afternoon Valerie,

    I believe that either Mike Beck or Joe Meyers might have already discussed with you a little about the upcoming work for the Argonne Quads that we are receiving and reworking for BNL. I am now planning the work for the receipt and inspection of the girders and discussing the initial groundwork for the reworking. Would you have some time to meet via teams to discuss what would be needed to create the initial travelers for the receipt of the girders? In my mind this would be a rather simple traveler, just detailing if its arrived, what magnets are on it, where it is stored, and perhaps upload either radcon documents or pictures. Perhaps I can just create a mock up traveler if that helps?

Thanks,

Chase

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230905/26f3e1c3/attachment-0001.html>