[Pansophy] NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R1

[Mike Drury]

This is what I see when I look at the traveler in Pansophy for either step:


On 4/23/2024 10:47 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> I talked to Valerie, and we decided an R2 was best. However, as I went 
> into the documents to add the file uploads, I found that steps 69 and 
> 97 already have file uploads. Was there somewhere else that they were 
> supposed to be, or are we actually good?
>
>
> Allen
>
> *From:* Mike Drury <drury at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 23, 2024 9:47 AM
> *To:* Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Mike McCaughan <michaelm at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R1
>
> I'm inclined to leave it alone.  This is a one-off traveler and we can 
> add comments for any deviations from the numbers that qualify for 
> NCR's in the instructions.  These numbers are often being decided on 
> the fly.
> There is one problem I found looking at the traveler again that should 
> probably be fixed.  There should be file upload fields for lines 69 
> and 97.
> If that needs a Rev, then fine.  I have yet to instantiate a traveler 
> though if that helps.
> Mike
>
> On 4/23/2024 9:28 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
>     Mike McCaughan,
>
>     I was looking over the approval email for NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R1
>     now that Tony had signed (he hadn’t at the time I uploaded to
>     pansophy, but we needed the traveler in production). I noticed
>     that you had quite a few comments regarding changes that needed to
>     be made to the traveler. We at pansophy are willing to make minor
>     changes to a document after it has been approved, but it is not
>     preferred, and we don’t like making major changes. In this case,
>     it probably would have been best to disapprove and list the
>     changes that needed to be made; either by us or by the document
>     author. Nothing for it at this point, just something to keep in
>     mind going forward.
>
>     Mike Drury, I’ve copied the text of Mike McCaughan’s comments down
>     below. Do these changes need to be implemented? At this point we’d
>     probably have to do an R2 of the document, especially if data has
>     already been entered.
>
>     Mike McCaughan, 04/16/2024 10:15:42 Approved:
>
>     Steps 43/49: Update gradient targets to Emax - 1MV/m from 4K VTA
>     data: 12.6 (cav. 7) and 8.12 (cav. 8).
>
>     Steps 59 & 63: Update targets to Eop, Eop - 2 MV/m, and Eop - 4
>     MV/m. Both Qos in VTA were ~2.5e9 at 4K.
>
>     Between steps 69 and 70 do we want to insert Emax measurements at
>     2K before taking Qos again as we should reach higher gradients?
>     New 2K targets 17.5 (cav. 7) and 8.2 MV/m (cav. 8) [Emax,VTA -
>     1MV/m; copy paste steps 47-52]
>
>     Present steps 71 & 75 - I think Qo target numbers for NCR writing
>     are swapped.
>
>     Step 78: Do we actually want to do the full +/- 500 kHz range
>     test? Defere to Gigi/Grigory. Smaller 2K loop seems reasonable.
>     +/- 50 kHz range probably more than sufficient.
>
>     Steps 83 & 92: New targets 17.5 and 8.2 MV/m respectively (VTA
>     Emax - 1 MV/m)
>
>     Steps 99 and 102: Qo targets should perhaps be 2.7e9 and 1.2e10
>     from VTA data?
>
>     Allen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240423/d5e302fb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: u03BoZlYIxZhPosA.png
Type: image/png
Size: 31360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240423/d5e302fb/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 29322 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240423/d5e302fb/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 32406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240423/d5e302fb/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240423/d5e302fb/attachment-0007.png>