[Pansophy] Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31

[John Vennekate]

Valerie,

Unfortunately, I do disagree. The initial version of the final disposition is a copy of the first disposition i.e. there is no additional information that needs to be kept as a historic record. The only aspect we could add to the first disposition is the CTB decision date of 02-Feb-2022.
My suggestion is that the final disposition should be changed to “Use as is” and a comment “Accepted by CTB as marginal and to be used in string J31 on 02-Jul-2024”.

Closing the NCR with the initial version of the disposition was simply a mistake by the corresponding author. He’s the one to blame 😉
Please let me know how you suggest to correct such mistakes in compliance with our ISO standards.
Plus, we have the issue Ashley mentioned. My personal take is that we should be more open to keeping NCRs open as long as there is no final disposition, which, given the extent such projects, can take its time.

Thanks,
John V

PS: I plan to go over some similar cases with Ashley next week, so, we might have some more of those cases.


From: Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024 16:04
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>; John Vennekate <hannesv at jlab.org>
Cc: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31

Valerie,

I agree, we need to keep the historic record.  We should discuss/develop a process for how best to do this as there are several cavities that were dispositioned "reject" while they were on hold as a spare so we could close the NCRs, so this won't be a one-off incidence.  I can include the process in my NCR revision.

Have a great weekend all!

- Ashley
________________________________
From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2024 3:45 PM
To: John Vennekate <hannesv at jlab.org<mailto:hannesv at jlab.org>>
Cc: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org<mailto:ashleya at jlab.org>>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Fw: Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31

John V,

I have spoken with Tony about this NCR and I requested that the "history" of this change should not be lost.
If you merely change the entire NCR, then it breaks our ISO compliance to maintaining records.

If you don't agree with this decision, then please reach out to me.
Thank You.




Valerie Bookwalter

Jefferson Lab, Accelerator Dept. SRFOPS

Software Systems Group

bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>

757-269-5802



________________________________
From: Matthew Menia <menia at jlab.org<mailto:menia at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 1:15 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Subject: FW: Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31


How should I respond to this?



From: John Vennekate <hannesv at jlab.org<mailto:hannesv at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 11:46 AM
To: Matthew Menia <menia at jlab.org<mailto:menia at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31



This should not be added as a comment. I had asked to re-open the NCR.





Cheers,

John V

-7607







From: MENIA at JLAB.ORG<mailto:MENIA at JLAB.ORG> <MENIA at JLAB.ORG<mailto:MENIA at JLAB.ORG>>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2024 10:46
To: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org<mailto:powen at jlab.org>>
Cc: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org<mailto:forehand at jlab.org>>; GANEY at JLAB.ORG<mailto:GANEY at JLAB.ORG>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org<mailto:kdavis at jlab.org>>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>; Mike Bevins <mbevins at jlab.org<mailto:mbevins at jlab.org>>; John Vennekate <hannesv at jlab.org<mailto:hannesv at jlab.org>>; SRFINV at JLAB.ORG<mailto:SRFINV at JLAB.ORG>
Subject: Final Disposition: NCR:120 on L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31



An Engineer has responded to the reworked/remeasured Non-Conformance Report - sequence number 120 for traveler L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF-R3--31.

THIS NCR HAS BEEN AUTOMATICALLY CLOSED BASED ON DISPOSITION



PAGE 4: FINAL DISPOSITION

Response Engr:

HANNESV

Response Date:

02-Feb-2022

Disposition:

Reject

Disposition Comment:

02-Feb-2022 Cavity put on hold by CTB. Final Disposition Rejected. 12-Sept-2024 HANNESV (DO NOT DELETE PREVIOUS REJECTION COMMENT.add ctb decision here to recall this cavity and attach email confirming use)



PAGE 3: MODIFICATION/RE-MEASURE

Rework Staff:



Rework Date:



Rework Comment:



Verify Staff:



Verify Date:



Verify Comment:





ENGINEER RESPONSE

Response Engr:



Response Date:



Disposition:

Hold/Modify

Disposition Comment:



PAGE 2: FIRST DISPOSITION

Response Engr:

HANNESV

Response Date:

14-Jan-2022

Disposition:

Hold/Modify

Disposition Comment:

We will put this cavity on hold for the time being. It might be selected for a string in combination with strong performing cavities at a later point in time.



PAGE 1: INITIATE AND DESCRIBE

SN:

HE-R017

SNtype:

CAVSN

DRAWING NUM:

F10023864

PART DESCRIPTION:



TRAV_ID:

L2HE-VTA-CAV-VTRF

TRAV_REV:

R3

TRAV_SEQ_NUM:

31

DESCRIBE STAFF:

POWEN

DESCRIBE DATE:

2022-01-13 16:31:00.0

DESCRIBE COMMENT:

Cavity unable to reach required gradient 23 MV/m

NOTIFICATION COMMENT:



The NCR is at the following URL: 120<https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/TRAVELER_FORM.cfm?project=L2HE&area=L2HE&system=NCR&TRAV_ID=L2HE-NCR&TRAV_REVISION=R12&page=4&maxpage=4&TRAV_SEQ_NUM=120&travstat=y&serialnum=HE-R017&SN=HE-R017&SNTYPE=CAVSN>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240913/bcead3b0/attachment-0001.html>