[Pansophy] L2HE to L2RB Procedures
Tony Reilly
areilly at jlab.org
Fri Jun 6 12:27:19 EDT 2025
Hi All,
Any procedure that is referenced by an L2RB Traveler needs to be ported over to L2RB.
Thanks,
Tony
________________________________
From: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 11:16 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: L2HE to L2RB Procedures
All,
I think most of the L2RB documents should reference L2HE documents. The L2RB documents were not made from scratch, most of them are direct copies and just "rebranded" L2RB. As I understand it, the requirement was to make new travelers and procedures with the new project title, this is being done, I think the references provided a starting point if there are questions in the future about these new travelers and procedures.
Adam Grabowski
SRF Test Engineer, L2HE Project CAM
Jefferson Lab
600 KELVIN DR Suite # 8
Mail Stop 55H
Newport News, VA 23606
O: 757-269-7665
C: 360-320-7003
E: adamg at jlab.org
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 1:56 PM
To: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Ashley Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>
Cc: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: L2HE to L2RB Procedures
Good afternoon, all,
I was working on the L2RB-PR-CMA-WS5-DISA-R1<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-301140/L2RB-PR-CMA-WS5-DISA.docx> procedure for John when I noticed it was referencing an L2HE procedure. Following the trail, I found that each procedure had another linked L2HE procedure. I was instructed to reach out to you all to ask what to do about them. I took the liberty of converting two of them, which I've attached to this email. The other two I found are L2HE-PR-CMA-FPCW-INSP-R1<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-244733/L2HE-PR-CMA-FPCW-INSP-R1.pdf> and LCLSII-HE Fundamental Power Coupler ESD<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-242797/LCLSII-HE-1.2-ES-0059.pdf>. What are your thoughts on this? Should they be ported over to L2RB, or should some alternative solution be implemented?
Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250606/7626400a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Pansophy
mailing list