[PRad] draft presentation

[gasparan at jlab.org]

  Eugene,

 Here are some discussions:
 1) If we keep HyCal on the transporter we can not put accurately
    enough in the beam and survey it (with the GEM).
 2) We need to protect the rest of the setup while accelerator is
    tuning the beam. The "Beam block" is in between two collimators.
    We have done that in past many times. Are you referring to legal
    terminology (safety) or a technical possibility?
 3)for the "dropping 1(bcdf) items, I do not see a connection with HyCal
   being in the beam. I think we need to see the quality of the e-beam
   by scanning it with the upstream harp. Are you questioning the
   detection part of the harp?
 4) for the part 2(lmn), yes it is utilizing the additional foils with
    quadrants. Do you want to change the wording?
 5) yes, I will add the GEM timing part.

 Please comment, the HyCal in the beam is important question.

 Ashot

> Some comments on the Run Plan.
>
> We should keep HyCal on the transporter for the test run.
>
> 1. There is no "Beam block" position for the collimator. We should use FSD
> interlock with tagger magnet power supply.
>
> Drop 1(b,c,d,f) It is pointless because HyCal will not be in the beam.
>
> Cell alignment procedure 2(l,m,n) should be changed to utilize additional
> foils with quadrants.
>
> Add GEM trigger delay adjustment.
>
> -Eugene
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ashot Gasparian" <gasparan at jlab.org>
>> To: "prad" <prad at jlab.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 4:09:15 PM
>> Subject: [PRad] draft presentation
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The draft of my presentation is attached. I am still working on the
>> formating
>> part so, please check the information and the numbers for now.
>>
>> Kondo, please check the "GEM Requirement" slides and let me know if some
>> numbers need to be corrected.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Ashot
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PRad mailing list
>> PRad at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
>