[PRad] [EXTERNAL] Re: meeting if you want

[gasparan at jlab.org]

  Hi Kondo,

 Congratulation to All and you especially for your excellent work
 in the PRad experiment.

 We have to start puting together a plan for the upgrade. I assume
 that the JLab administration will request a meeting as soon as in
 late September.

 Ashot


> Dear all,
> congratulation to All for the approval of the PRad-II proposal.  This is
> great news.
> For the uRWELL upgrade, a very modest R&D plan for prototyping a medium
> size uRWELL detector will go a long way in dissipating all the skepticism
> and fears for new technology.
>
>   *   uRWELL will truly represent a major upgrade relative to GEMs on many
> levels (lower material budget, no spacer)  at a lower cost and far lower
> construction risk, but it is a detector that was never ran in an
> experiment so far and many people have reservation about it.
>   *   If we can build a small prototype of the detector we are proposing
> for PRad-II that could be tested in beam test within a year, we can
> demonstrate that it is a low risk high reward option even compared to
> the GEM that worked very well for PRad
>
> Best regards
> Kondo
>
> ________________________________
> From: PRad <prad-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of gasparan at jlab.org
> <gasparan at jlab.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 3:19 PM
> To: Dipangkar Dutta <ddutta07 at gmail.com>
> Cc: prad <prad at jlab.org>
> Subject: Re: [PRad] [EXTERNAL] Re: meeting if you want
>
>
>   Hi Dipangkar,
>
>  Congratulations to All and especially to you for the approval
>  of the PRad-II proposal with an "A" rating. The rating itself
>  is saying many things!!!
>
>  For the conditions: we kind of expected this outcome, we are asking
>  a significant setup upgrade (~$6-7M), quite naturally they are asking
>  to work with the Lab and find out how. The condition is packaged as
>  both the micro-well GEMs and the HyCal upgrade.
>
>  I agree, we have to insist for the HyCal upgrade, that is critical
>  for this experiment and several others which will come later.
>
>  For the DRad: the PAC decided to not give us both, so it is still
>  alive. We will come to the DRad once we are very close (or done)
>  with the PRad-II.
>
>
>
>
>> Sorry looks like I missed the meeting. I was not sure about one of the
>> conditions for PRad-II, did they say
>> the upgrade of HyCal to all crystal is not necessary?
>> But I guess we just have to convince JLab that this upgrade is
>> necessary.
>> Cheers
>> Dipangkar
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:24 PM <gasparan at jlab.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>   Hi All,
>>>  We may have a short meeting from 2:30 pm today if you want.
>>>
>>>  Or, Vladimir, please start the bluejeans now and see if we can
>>>  have an half an hour discussions.
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>  Ashot
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PRad mailing list
>>> PRad at jlab.org
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__secure-2Dweb.cisco.com_1L5yu4-5FIahcG-5Ff4oIT3EwfF6pceO5dY9imsNKB2mR07-5F05YycZFr1sLRcQQfBvbjr07GVM2s-5Fcy0ZgJ1Upbj1lTWEr8KXJNEA5TxM-5FRH01zX9KU12QNvMDOqNEse9jNJ-5FJPFjT8CbAHCOOwbQvb0ZBaZSqIiOlkoXH34n-2D-5F14mbMQ-5FYC4Nj3yTPom1KcCFHd2X1YF3JUvXuSaumf7t-5FhUksjXgTef7t1owaJ0SihPY9GqV1G-2DsMiatLp0xx-2DyzWuOq0gdyGRM6180-2D6rr5raSRhG2JgiuV8Uh-2DRztj3kVEhZd0mT310j6VlCL1WoxOfOO_https-253A-252F-252Fmailman.jlab.org-252Fmailman-252Flistinfo-252Fprad&d=DwIFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=CjpZ76rO6EAt56TATc9KICtwnYfnSZxGFWpuPAJwuzM&m=2HMYC1cU2-0CQ984iplNgkserYoDHF7AM18nw0nIpAY&s=QIHSb6g2I-xwbhxBRJGsFTSfi1OAidXb6kfaf-alvYw&e=
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PRad mailing list
> PRad at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/prad
>