[Primexd] [Revised Logentry] CCAL occupancy plots

Justin Stevens jrsteven at jlab.org
Thu Feb 28 12:53:20 EST 2019


Hi All,

Please see my comment to Drew’s log entry https://logbooks.jlab.org/comment/20469#comment-20469, crudely comparing Liping’s simulated distribution to the monitoring plots from data.  Unless I’m missing something (which is certainly possible), this looks more like a shift in the acceptance region than an unexpected hole.  Please correct me if there’s some reason I should be comparing these two distributions directly.

Following up on my earlier suggestion, this would be much easier to compare if we had some simulated event samples that could be run through the same reconstruction path as the data…

-Justin

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 11:10 AM, Justin Stevens <jrsteven at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Liping,
> 
> Thanks for the plots.  Just to be clear, are these simulated distributions with the CompCal in it’s current (as-built) position and all upstream material included?
> 
> Also, do we have this compton event generator in the Hall D simulation framework where we can simulate these events compton events and run them through our full simulation: hdgeant(4), mcsmear, reconstruction, etc.?  It would be really useful to have some MC samples to compare with the compton data samples being collected now.
> 
> -Justin
> 
>> On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:27 PM, Gan, Liping <ganl at uncw.edu <mailto:ganl at uncw.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, all,
>> 
>> Attached file is simulated Compton event distributions on CCAL. 
>> 
>> Liping
>> 
>> 
>> From: Primexd <primexd-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:primexd-bounces at jlab.org>> on behalf of Ilya Larin <ilarin at jlab.org <mailto:ilarin at jlab.org>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 10:54 PM
>> To: gasparan at jlab.org <mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>; Alexander Somov
>> Cc: primexd at jlab.org <mailto:primexd at jlab.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Primexd] [Revised Logentry] CCAL occupancy plots
>>  
>> 
>>   One of the possible options is exactly what we had in Primex-1 in 2004
>> with the missing HyCal square: Low energy hits occupancy looks uniform,
>> while high energy ones show missing column, as it would be no info going
>> to the trigger sum. But my assumption can be wrong: still investigating.
>> 
>>  Ilya
>> 
>> 
>> От: Primexd <primexd-bounces at jlab.org <mailto:primexd-bounces at jlab.org>> от имени gasparan at jlab.org <mailto:gasparan at jlab.org> <gasparan at jlab.org <mailto:gasparan at jlab.org>>
>> Отправлено: 27 февраля 2019 г. 21:58
>> Кому: Alexander Somov
>> Копия: primexd at jlab.org <mailto:primexd at jlab.org>
>> Тема: Re: [Primexd] [Revised Logentry] CCAL occupancy plots
>>  
>> 
>>   Looks not bad!, so what was wrong in Drew's plots?
>> 
>>  Ashot
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> > Logentry Text:
>> > --
>> > Just to follow up our discussions about Compton reconstruction and
>> > performance of the CCAL
>> >
>> > Below are some occupancy plots for triggered events (trigger bit 1)
>> >
>> > Fig. 1 Run 61321 (first Compton production run) 02/26, 1 am
>> > Fig. 2 Run 61331 (middle of production) 02/27, 1 am
>> > Fig. 3 Run 61340 (run recently taken) 02/27, 20 pm
>> >
>> > CCAL Occupancy from DigiHits       (top left)
>> > Energy weighted occupancy from DigiHit   (top right)
>> >
>> > The same for Hit factory        (middle plots)
>> > (calibration applied)
>> >
>> > FADC time in the readout window for all CCAL channels  (bottom plot)
>> >
>> > The occupancies are relatively uniform (except for a few cells, minor
>> > effect)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---
>> >
>> > This is a plain text email for clients that cannot display HTML.  The full
>> > logentry can be found online at
>> > https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3660887_______________________________________________ <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flogbooks.jlab.org%2Fentry%2F3660887_______________________________________________&data=02%7C01%7Cjrsteven%40jlab.org%7C3e91a97511014db4605008d69d975797%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636869670667610004&sdata=VHQrBgZkjZo%2Fonwmn8OLCeRjY6frRKFv9r6Zptcp%2Fc0%3D&reserved=0>
>> > Primexd mailing list
>> > Primexd at jlab.org <mailto:Primexd at jlab.org>
>> > https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/primexd <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.jlab.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fprimexd&data=02%7C01%7Cjrsteven%40jlab.org%7C3e91a97511014db4605008d69d975797%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636869670667620013&sdata=IhTRaHpUXmYKSxVsWHj%2BMDUI3owV2DB3qgs1eMkOmH8%3D&reserved=0>
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Primexd mailing list
>> Primexd at jlab.org <mailto:Primexd at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/primexd <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.jlab.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fprimexd&data=02%7C01%7Cjrsteven%40jlab.org%7C3e91a97511014db4605008d69d975797%7Cb4d7ee1f4fb34f0690372b5b522042ab%7C1%7C0%7C636869670667630023&sdata=o0u92Gle3zxNzZYZMFQNlUyI5awQfVB7Juw2jdK4NQc%3D&reserved=0>
>> <Compton-dis.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> Primexd mailing list
>> Primexd at jlab.org <mailto:Primexd at jlab.org>
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/primexd <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/primexd>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Primexd mailing list
> Primexd at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/primexd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/primexd/attachments/20190228/25426f9a/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Primexd mailing list