[Rga_calib] [EXTERNAL] Re: RGA-Calibration-Spring2018

[Raffaella De Vita]

Dear Latifa,
I will not be able to attend the meeting but here are few comments on the FT and RF calibration status:
- FTCAL: both energy and time calibrations look good; the few outlier runs are either empty target or low statistics.
- FTHODO: same as above with the exception of the very first run range (3134-3222) were time is off; is this range considered to have good runs?
- RF: there is need for an adjustment of the constants that can be done with the files of this pass0. The exception is the very first run range 3134-3222 that would require some adjustment to the FTOF calibrations first.
Best regards,
	Raffaella 

> On 23 Jun 2021, at 16:41, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Please find in the link below the latest QA timeline of RGA-Calibrations. Please review your subsystem and define if new calibrations are needed.
>  https://clas12mon.jlab.org/timelines/?rg=rga <https://clas12mon.jlab.org/timelines/?rg=rga>
> 
> We will have a dedicated meeting tomorrow at 12:00 PM to go over the status and next steps. If you are unable to attend please send me your feedback before the meeting.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Latifa
> _______________________________________________
> Rga_calib mailing list
> Rga_calib at jlab.org <mailto:Rga_calib at jlab.org>
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib <https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/rga_calib/attachments/20210624/fbbde153/attachment.html>