[Rga_calib] [EXTERNAL] Re: RGA-Calibration-Spring2018
Latifa Elouadrhiri
latifa at jlab.org
Thu Jun 24 12:29:09 EDT 2021
Dear Raffaella
Thank you for the input
Best regards
Latifa
On Jun 24, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Raffaella De Vita <raffaella.devita at ge.infn.it> wrote:
Dear Latifa,
I will not be able to attend the meeting but here are few comments on the FT and RF calibration status:
- FTCAL: both energy and time calibrations look good; the few outlier runs are either empty target or low statistics.
- FTHODO: same as above with the exception of the very first run range (3134-3222) were time is off; is this range considered to have good runs?
- RF: there is need for an adjustment of the constants that can be done with the files of this pass0. The exception is the very first run range 3134-3222 that would require some adjustment to the FTOF calibrations first.
Best regards,
Raffaella
On 23 Jun 2021, at 16:41, Latifa Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org<mailto:latifa at jlab.org>> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find in the link below the latest QA timeline of RGA-Calibrations. Please review your subsystem and define if new calibrations are needed.
https://clas12mon.jlab.org/timelines/?rg=rga
We will have a dedicated meeting tomorrow at 12:00 PM to go over the status and next steps. If you are unable to attend please send me your feedback before the meeting.
Best regards,
Latifa
_______________________________________________
Rga_calib mailing list
Rga_calib at jlab.org<mailto:Rga_calib at jlab.org>
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rga_calib
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/rga_calib/attachments/20210624/63fe0c8a/attachment.html>
More information about the Rga_calib
mailing list