[Rgc] new location of trains of test runs for pass1 review of F22

[silvia at jlab.org]

Dear RGC analyzers,
we have the majority of the trains of the test runs produced, the
locations are different from the ones I gave yesterday, you'll find them
here:

For CCDB:
16856  16877  16969  16970  16975  17020 in
/volatile/clas12/rg-c/productionNew/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_ccdb1/train/
17084  17085  17139 in
/volatile/clas12/rg-c/productionNew/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_ccdb2/train/
For sqlite:
16856  16877  16969  16970  16975  17020 in
/volatile/clas12/rg-c/productionNew/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_sqlite1/train/
17084  17085  17139 in
/volatile/clas12/rg-c/productionNew/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_sqlite2/train/

One NH3 run is still running (the one from the flipped solenoid period)
and two carbon runs are also running.

If you can meanwhile work with these runs to make the plots for the review
it would be great.

Thank you and see you soon.
Best regards,
Silvia


> Dear all,
> tomorrow (Tuesday, August 27th), we'll have our weekly RGC meeting, at
> 8:30AM JLab time, zoom link: https://jlab-org.zoomgov.com/j/1601890334
> We'll have a presentation by Noémie, and discuss the preparation of the
> pass1 review for Fall22 (Wednesday at 9am). Please let me know if other
> subjects need to be discussed.
>
> For the preparation of the review, I had sent the path to the cooked test
> runs a while ago, and so far got plots only from Kayleigh (thank you!).
>
> However, in the meantime, two issues were found in those data:
>
> 1) The AI tracking had used the network of Summer22 data, not the one we
> have trained for Fall22. The impact of this is likely more than minimal
> (the performances of the two networks are very close), but we need,
> nonetheless, to show the analysis results for the final/official version
> of the reconstruction, AI included.
>
> 2) The HWP information had not been included in CCDB for runs after 17153
> (mea culpa). This only affects those who include asymmetries in their
> plots, and used runs > 17153.
>
> We have resubmitted all the cookings (dst and pass0's a few days ago), and
> hopefully they should be completed between this evening and tomorrow.
>
> I have to ask the analyzers to please use the new runs to reproduce their
> slides. They should be available shortly, in the following locations (some
> of the runs are just for Derek's studies):
>
> For CCDB:
> 16856  16877  16969  16970  16975  17020 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_ccdb1/dst/train/
> 17084  17085  17139 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_ccdb2/dst/train/
> 17178  17313  17361 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_22_24_dst_ccdb/dst/train/
> For sqlite:
> 16856  16877  16969  16970  16975  17020 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_sqlite1/dst/train/
> 17084  17085  17139 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_21_24_dst_sqlite2/dst/train/
> 17178  17313  17361 in
> /volatile/clas12/rg-c/production/dst/10.1.0_08_22_24_dst_sqlite/dst/train/
>
> We have added run 17361, to the set of runs previously established, to
> also cover the part of the data with flipped solenoid. Please use it too
> for your studies.
>
> Either me or Li will send an email when all jobs are done and all runs are
> available, but maybe you can start checking for the runs you specifically
> need.
>
> Derek, it would be great if you can please redo the plots that I took from
> your slides to make the previous version of the pass1-review presentation
> (https://clasweb.jlab.org/wiki/images/a/a6/Pass1_review_fall2022.pdf),
> using the new runs.
>
> Ideally, I'll need all slides by tomorrow evening, provided that the data
> are available before...
>
> I thank you all for the help, patience, and support.
> See you tomorrow.
> Best regards,
> Silvia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rgc_analysis mailing list
> Rgc_analysis at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/rgc_analysis
>