[Sane-analysis] Minutes of July 20 Analysis Meeting

[Narbe Kalantarians]

Think I mis-spoke. The errors estimated to decrease will be those for 
g_2, not just 4.7GeV.


Narbe Kalantarians wrote:
>
> _*Oscar:*_ Comparing ssf's g_1,2 data/FOM. The statistics are known to 
> be lower than what was proposed due to known reasons (target and beam 
> issues, Cerenkov and BigCal efficiencies). This has a cut of E' > 1.3 GeV
> http://twist.phys.virginia.edu/~or/sane/FOM_vs_data.pdf
> Estimates that error bars for the 4.7GeV data may decrease by ~> 30%, 
> after some of the data gets recovered (via better calibrations). Will 
> also try looking with E' > 0.8 GeV.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/sane-analysis/attachments/20110721/0845020d/attachment.html