[BTeam] Reschedule: Tuesday beam studies 9/15

[Brian Freeman]

As I mentioned last week, I am unavailable today to tun the BNNT test. I haven't heard anyone else step up to run the viewer test (Tief or Gubeli?). So, Jay it may fall off the list for today, Thank you.

-Brian
________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Michael Tiefenback <tiefen at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 8:18 AM
To: Jay Benesch <benesch at jlab.org>; Reza Kazimi <kazimi at jlab.org>
Cc: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [BTeam] Reschedule: Tuesday beam studies 9/15

Our viewer supports have not been designed to support any heat load.  I raise the question: Does CW on the BNNT flag result in heating which might have unpleasant consequences?  It seems to me that placing a BNNT flag into a more readily tended piece of beam line than Arc 7A would be better than potentially dirtying up ITV7A09.  An issue for discussion rather than a forecast of disaster.

I left the Bteam in the reply list in case others want to contribute to the discussion.

Michael Tiefenback

________________________________
From: BTeam <bteam-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Jay Benesch <benesch at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 16:36
To: Reza Kazimi <kazimi at jlab.org>
Cc: bteam at jlab.org <bteam at jlab.org>
Subject: [BTeam] Reschedule: Tuesday beam studies 9/15

Colleagues,

Given that the safety briefing is Tuesday, I will propose to the RCs tomorrow that the beam studies be done Monday.

It has been suggested that the BNNT viewer be re-classified in CED as CW and subjected to 30 uA CW just before Hall C switches to first pass.  This would be in lieu of tune beam Monday.  Comments?

Jay

________________________________________
From: Jay Benesch <benesch at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:20 PM
To: Reza Kazimi
Cc: bteam at jlab.org
Subject: Tuesday beam studies 9/15

Reza and colleagues,

I told the morning and 1330 meetings that we would be taking a full
eight hours next Tuesday, likely starting at 0900.  Test plan order
needs to be decided.  Hall C would like an hour access, not compatible
with Smart Alarm test plan or BNNT test plan.  Dennis's RayTrace test
plan is compatible.

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21000 RayTrace 1.5 hr

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21151  Smart Alarm 4 hr

http://opsweb.acc.jlab.org/CSUEApps/atlis/task/21234  BNNT 2 hr

Suggested order:

RayTrace so RadCon can support Hall C entry during normal hours.

restore CW through empty target to Hall C

Smart Alarm

BNNT Can this be parasitic during tune beam portion of Smart Alarm?
      If this falls off the table due to over-run of the two above, we
simply continue with existing viewer flags.

Begin restoration to all halls at 1630, after swing crew turn-over.
Attempt to complete by 1700, eight hours after start.

Jay

_______________________________________________
BTeam mailing list
BTeam at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/bteam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/bteam/attachments/20200914/9bac555c/attachment.html>