[Clas12_calcom] [EXTERNAL] RGA Sp18 6 and 10 GeV timelines posted

[silvia at jlab.org]

Hi Timothy,
I looked at the timelines, and I'd say that for CND I'd need, to start,
probably two runs from the 3-pass dataset and ~4 from the other one.
Then there may be the need for individual runs to be fixed. Doesn't look,
a priori, a much bigget effort than previous RGA periods.
Best regards,
Silvia


> Dear CALCOM,
>
> After a significant number of hurdles we finally have some semblance of
> the “complete” timelines for RGA Sp18. What we ended up doing was
> plotting every other run in some places and every third run in others for
> the 10 GeV (which have a very large number of total runs). I would
> appreciate if subsystem experts could have a cursory look at their
> timelines and let me know their general thoughts. In particular, a loose
> estimate of how much effort they would expect to be required in order to
> calibrate their subsystems. Significantly more than Fa18 or a comparable
> amount? No need to pick out runs to calibrate or anything like that, just
> a first look. Remember to make use of the inbending and outbending filters
> at the top as the 10 GeV timeline includes both polarities and they
> aren’t in continuous chunks. Finally, as this is the first complete
> timeline we’ll probably be removing several runs from the list of those
> that planned to be calibrated (I already see a few trigger tests etc) so
> don’t worry about the runs with super special conditions.
>
> 3-pass
> timeline<https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rga/pass2/sp18/pass0/sp18_v0.04_6GeV/tlsummary/>
> 5-pass
> timeline<https://clas12mon.jlab.org/rga/pass2/sp18/pass0/sp18_v0.04_10GeV/tlsummary/>
>
> Best regards,
> Timothy
> _______________________________________________
> Clas12_calcom mailing list
> Clas12_calcom at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_calcom
>