[Clas12_rgb] trains redefinition - feedback needed
Silvia Niccolai
silvia at jlab.org
Fri Nov 13 11:29:29 EST 2020
Hi FX,
That is a good point, we’ll check the effect of this cut and decide whether or not it is necessary, and if it is we’ll make it lower than 1.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Silvia
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Nov 2020, at 17:23, Francois-Xavier Girod <fxgirod at jlab.org> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Silvia, all
>
> Can you be a bit more quantitative about the change in Q2 cut for DVCS wagon? What is the DVCS output fraction and what will it be after you change the cut?
> In my experience the DVCS wagon output is quite small and it will not change much if you include events slightly below Q2=1
> For instance the slow control events currently make quite a significant fraction of the exclusive wagon output, and no cut will change that part
>
> You should be careful if you will use Q2=1 as your standard publication cut, keep in mind that the wagon do not have any kinematic correction, and kinematic corrections can move events from below to above the Q2=1
> This is the main reason I originally chose to lower these DIS cut in the exclusive wagons
>
> Best regards
> FX
>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 2:03 PM <silvia at jlab.org> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> one of the two recommendation of the RG-B Fall review is to reduce
>> considerably the size of our trains. Due to the much higher rates at low
>> Q2 of the outbending Fall data, compared to the Spring ones, our inclusive
>> train is too big. Our trains are in total 60% of the size of the cooked
>> run, and the inclusive train makes up for 75% of this. The committee
>> recommends to scale down the skims size to no more than 20% of the cooked
>> files.
>> We are therefore planning to remove this train. If people really need
>> this, please let us know, and we can discuss and find out if it is
>> possible to find some additional cuts to include in order to make it
>> bearable.
>> We are also planning to add a Q2>1 cut to the DVCS train to reduce its size.
>> Please get in touch as soon as possible if you have objections or comments
>> on this plan. I'd like to send a reply to the committee by this evening
>> (EU time).
>> Thanks a lot and best regards,
>> Silvia
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Clas12_rgb mailing list
>> Clas12_rgb at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/clas12_rgb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgb/attachments/20201113/f5d5f9ab/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Clas12_rgb
mailing list