[clas12_rgk] [EXTERNAL] Re: CLAS12 scheduling for FY21 and FY22 - REMINDER -

[burkert]

Annalisa
I thought you said to send the comments to Marco by Friday evening.
So, may comments that I just sent to you didn't make it in time.
Why did you rush it?
Volker


On 9/6/19 3:11 PM, Annalisa D'Angelo wrote:
>
> Dear Marco,
>
> please find the requested summary for RGK in attachment.
>
> All the best
>
> Annalisa
>
> Il 05/09/19 11:29, Marco Battaglieri ha scritto:
>> ... just a gentle reminder
>> cheers
>> Marco
>>
>>
>> Dear CLAS12 Run Groups (RG) contact-persons,
>> as you probably know, I'm taking the Hall-B leadership starting from 
>> mid September and one of the first topic I will be asked to discuss 
>> with the Physics Division is the Hall-B scheduling for next years.
>> While the scheduling for FY20 (see Rolf's message at the beginning of 
>> August) is almost firm (the official rescheduling will be available 
>> soon), a proposal for FY21 and FY22 should be presented early this fall.
>> The scheduling is a quite complicated process that requires to take 
>> into account many factors that include: PAC scientific rating, 
>> technical issues, readiness of the experiments, compatibility with 
>> other halls requests, ... and especially (your) capability of putting 
>> together as many experiments as possible with the same run condition 
>> in order to get the best for the CLAS12 Collaboration out of every 
>> single day of run.
>>
>> I think this is a good time to start a discussion with you (and 
>> within the RG you represent), collecting information useful for an 
>> efficient and agreed schedule for the future years.
>>
>> I'd like to have from each of you *a short document (max 4 pages)* 
>> reporting:
>> - *the list of exps* you represent (including spokesperson names);
>> - *key-words/highlights* about the physics program of your RG (very 
>> short);
>> - the number of *allocated PAC days*;
>> - the number of *days already run* (if any);
>> - *run conditions* (for the remaining part) in two scenarios 
>> (optimal/minimal) to accomplish the physics program (or a significant 
>> fraction) of your physics program;
>> - any other RG/experiment that, at your knowledge, may *share the 
>> same run conditions* of your RG;
>> - a detailed list of *non-standard equipment* (something 
>> more/different than current CLAS12 set up) or specific needs of your RG;
>> - the *readiness of your experiment* (equipment- and 
>> DAQ/trigger-wise) including the ERR conclusions/recommendations (if any);
>> - *best arguments* to motivate the allocation for FY21 and FY22 of a 
>> certain *fraction*  of the full PAC run-time considering  two 
>> possible scenarios (optimal/minimal);
>> - any *known issues/difficulties* related to your run conditions 
>> where the Lab could help with;
>> - any short*on-beam tests* could be useful to asses the experiment 
>> readiness and the capability to run at the desired condition (e.g. of 
>> luminosity).
>>
>> Please provide the most possible accurate and sincere information in 
>> order to define CLAS12 RG needs and readiness: this is just one piece 
>> of the whole picture and I need to have it as clear as possible to 
>> defend Hall-B (our!) interests in front of JLab management.
>>
>> Let me stress that we are a Collaboration and our strength resides 
>> not only in our-own preferred experiment but especially in our 
>> capability in taking advantage of all other CLAS12 runs to shape the 
>> physics program we are interested in. Understanding reasons of other 
>> RGs and acting as a whole, is the only way to make CLAS12 physics 
>> program bigger than the algebraic sum of the different experiments!
>>
>> I'd appreciate if you could draft and send me the document *by Friday 
>> September 6th*.
>> Thanks in advance
>> Marco
>>
>> ps here below is the most updated  list of RG representatives I got 
>> from PhysDiv.
>> Let me know if anything is changed in your RG
>> RG-A: L.Elouadrhirs
>> RG-B: S.Niccolai
>> RG-C: S.Khun
>> RG-D: L. El Fassi
>> RG-E: W.Brooks
>> RG-F: S. Khun
>> RG-G: W.Brooks
>> RG-H: M.Contalbrigo
>> RG-K: A. D’Angelo
>> RG-L: R.Dupre
>> RG-M: L. Weinstein
> -- 
> ================================================
> Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
> Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
> INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
> email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it  
> Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
> Email:annalisa at jlab.org
> Tel: + 39 06 72594562
>
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20190906/582eb4e4/attachment.html>