[clas12_rgk] Fwd: Hall-B CY23 and CY24 scheduling preparation

[Annalisa D'Angelo]

FYI

Annalisa



-------- Messaggio Inoltrato --------
Oggetto: 	Hall-B CY23 and CY24 scheduling preparation
Data: 	Tue, 5 Oct 2021 16:52:14 +0000
Mittente: 	Marco Battaglieri <battagli at jlab.org>
A: 	Raphael Dupre <raphael.dupre at ijclab.in2p3.fr>, Lamiaa El Fassi 
<elfassi at jlab.org>, Annalisa D'Angelo <annalisa at jlab.org>, Latifa 
Elouadrhiri <latifa at jlab.org>, Meziani, Zein-Eddine <zmeziani at anl.gov>, 
Armstrong, Whitney R. <warmstrong at anl.gov>, Will Brooks <brooksw at jlab.org>
CC: 	Eugene Pasyuk <pasyuk at jlab.org>, Bob Miller <rmiller at jlab.org>, 
Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>, Daniel Carman <carman at jlab.org>, 
Sergey Boyarinov <boiarino at jlab.org>, Nathan Baltzell <baltzell at jlab.org>



Dear RG representatives
as you know I asked the link persons of the RGs that will be able to run 
in CY23 and CY24 (CY22 is already booked by RGC) to provide one page 
with information useful/necessary to define the Hall-B proposal in the 
upcoming scheduling discussion.
Having in mind that we want to have all RGs that went trough an ERR to 
collect a significant fraction of their data (>40-50%) and some RGs 
already did, the list will be limited to:
- RG-K (only collected 12% of the assigned PAC days)
- RG-D
- RG-E
- RG-L
I’d like to have *a meeting next week* with Hall-B staff members (in CC) 
to discuss with you the readiness of your RG

Please *prepare 1 slide* (just one!) with the following information:
*- Run conditions:*
— PAC rating of the experiment
— Beam energy, beam current, polarisation
— number of PAC days granted
— dedicated detector/target/component (NOT YET PRESENT IN CLAS12 AS PER 
TODAY)
— any special requirement
-*SW status* (in case you have dedicated non-standard equipment)
— implementation in GEMC
— implementation in REC code
*- ERR status*
— any issues raised by the ERR still pending
— workplan to respond and clear the review
— status of any PAC requests (beside ERR)

In case you are not able to run immediately (either because some 
components are not ready or you still need the full ERR approval) 
*prepare +1 slide* (just one) with timeline/workplan/milestones to be 
ready to run  for the proposed date.

I strongly encourage RG representatives  to discuss among you (in 
particular RGD and RG-E) to see if different RGs  could run in parallel. 
Any possibility will simplify the scheduling process and increase the 
chance to have your  experiment firmly  scheduled.

Please*fill the doodle by Friday Oct 8 at noon*. I’ll send the date by 
Friday COB.
https://doodle.com/poll/x3hupmsdfg2msv3w?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link 
<https://doodle.com/poll/x3hupmsdfg2msv3w?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link>

Thanks in advance
Marco

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/clas12_rgk/attachments/20211006/e49645d0/attachment.html>