[Dsg-rich] Fwd: Re: lifting tool for RICH
Suresh Chandra
chandra at jlab.org
Tue Apr 4 11:23:30 EDT 2017
Marc,
What is maximum load that the device is to lift & for what load the load
test is planned?
Suresh
On 4/4/2017 10:07 AM, Marc McMullen wrote:
>
> Hi Rusty and Suresh,
>
> Our collaborators from INFN (Italy) are having an "under the hook
> lifting device" fabricated here in the US at one of the Jlab
> procurement approved welder/fab shops. Below is the information I got
> from the EH&S manual on requirements for a device to be used here at
> the lab.
>
> Due to cost, they will probably have the load test done by Hall B
> Mechanical/Engineering and I have asked them to have the final design
> reviewed by Bob Miller to make sure that the design passes Jlab
> standards.
>
> Is there anything else which would need to be done that I might be
> overlooking?
>
> I have attached the .pdf of the preliminary files INFN used for RFQs.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Dsg-rich] lifting tool for RICH
> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:12:10 -0400
> From: Marc McMullen <mcmullen at jlab.org>
> To: Marco Mirazita <Marco.Mirazita at lnf.infn.it>
> CC: dsg-rich <dsg-rich at jlab.org>, Bob Miller <rmiller at jlab.org>
>
>
>
> Marco,
>
> I am not sure if you are going to wait for any further quotes before
> going forward with the selection. But, when you ask the vendor to
> "re-quote" to satisfy your requirements, the vendor will need specific
> details about information/documentation you need in your final quote
> (Or they will just send the same quote).
>
> Doug has provided some information to help us fulfill some of the Jlab
> requirements for approved use at JLab. In his email, he is referring
> to specifications that need to be followed by the designer and
> fabrication shop:
>
> * The shop was selected from the Jlab approved fabricators list for
> welding/brazing.
> * A qualified Professional Engineer (PE) must approve/design the
> "Below The Hook Lifting Device" in accordance with ASME B30.20,
> ASME BTH-1.
> o When requesting the requote you should ensure that the
> fabrication shop meets these criteria
> o You may want a JLab PE to review the drawing, prior to
> manufacturing.
> + Bob may be able to review (If he has not already done it)
> this if you can provide him with the final drawings (after
> parts have been converted from metric components to the
> closest English standard)
> * The fabrication shop must label the device with the following
> information:
> o Manufacturer's Name
> o Manufacturer's Address
> o Serial Number
> o Lifter Weight, if over 100lbs (45Kg)
> o Rated Load
> * We will need to do a load test at Jlab or the shop will have to do
> it and label it as such.
> o We should ask the fabrication shop how much this would cost,
> maybe it is not expensive.
> o Hall B is qualified to do this test
>
> I will try to find out if there are other requirements or
> documentation needed for the stiffener.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
> On 3/31/2017 3:07 PM, Douglas Tilles wrote:
>> Not if it is done by a PE. It will need all the under hook paperwork
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Marc McMullen<mcmullen at jlab.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> So far all we have done is contacted fab shops for quotes. We asked Bob for advice on getting a better price, and are following his suggestion, he also suggested having the load test done here at the lab, should CE be contacted prior to manufacturing?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>>> On 3/31/2017 2:08 PM, Douglas Tilles wrote:
>>>> I guess you have contacted Civil Eng about a Under Hook Device review and inspection and load testing?
>>> --
>>> Marc McMullen
>>> Detector Support Group
>>> 757-269-7738
>>>
>
> --
> Marc McMullen
> Detector Support Group
> 757-269-7738
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20170404/3c3a4ff9/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Dsg-rich
mailing list