[Dsg-rich] Updated Drawings for RICH Stiffening Tool additional parts

[Marc McMullen]

Hi Bob,

The hardware is being purchased separately. As far as having the parts 
fabricated, are you confirming that we can go forward? Meaning you have 
review the changes and the drawings are now in compliance with your 
previous comments.

We want to make sure these drawings are correct, to eliminate any delay 
due to confusion on the part of the fabricator.

As for the hardware, we asked you for the English standard equivalent 
for grade 10.9 when we purchased the hardware for the Stiffening Tool. 
Your recommendation was grade 8. Should we just buy that grade for these 
parts, since they will be used for the load test.

I will ask Dario to remove the hardware grade, per your suggestion.

Thanks,

Marc


On 8/25/2017 11:24 AM, Bob Miller wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> The only comment I have is on the hardware, which should not stop the 
> procurement of these items.  Some of the hardware is called out as "HS 
> steel 10.9", then a notes states that it is grade 5. The 10.9 should 
> be removed as that is a metric bolt specification.  Also, the 1/2 inch 
> bolts will have a plating, so the torque should be 65 ft-lbs.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bob
>
> P.S. I will be on vacation until Tuesday.
>
>
>
> On 8/25/2017 11:07 AM, Marc McMullen wrote:
>> Hi Bob,
>>
>> Attached are the three sets of updated drawings produced by Dario 
>> Orecchini of INFN. He has added changes in accordance with your 
>> comments. Could you please review them and confirm that the changes 
>> are made per your comments.
>>
>> Per Patrizia's request, Jlab procurement is waiting for me to 
>> authorize them to proceed with the release of the associated 
>> requisitions. If these drawings are complete I will send them to 
>> procurement and they can order the fabrications.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>

-- 
Marc McMullen
Detector Support Group
757-269-7738