[dsg-hallb_rich] RICH hardware interlock.

[Amrit Yegneswaran]

o! my it took so may years to figure out rich 1 is in sector 1
hmmm and no one mentioned it? (its a rhetoric)

the shifters knowing the sector numbers,that's great progress
well when i was with clas 6 they didn't!
in fact many staff didn't know that we had a torus hanging from the ceiling encapsulated by the drift chambers😋

i'm also puzzled as to why the humidity sensors aren't enabled
that intellect fails me
sorry for my obtuseness

well anyway better later  than never
at fort meade (marland) they once decided to do the fireworks on the 5th of july because the fourth was on a friday!
god save america

happy 4th to all even though we celebrate it later/earlier


________________________________
From: dsg-hallb_rich <dsg-hallb_rich-bounces at jlab.org> on behalf of Tyler Lemon <tlemon at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 12:37 PM
To: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>; dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org <dsg-hallb_rich at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [dsg-hallb_rich] RICH hardware interlock.

Hi Valery,

I’ll work on changing the naming scheme to match what sector the detectors are in.

To make sure I have it right:
The old RICH will be relabeled to RICH Sector 4
The new RICH will be relabeled to RICH Sector 1


Also, I’ve noticed that for the detector formerly known as RICH-2, the interlocks for all humidity sensors and the N2 volume temperature sensors have never been enabled.

Would we ever plan to enable them? If not, would it be worth hiding the enable and limit set controls on EPICS to simplify screens? Something similar can also be done for the other sector if desired.

-Tyler
________________________________
From: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, July 1, 2022 12:09:18 PM
To: Tyler Lemon <tlemon at jlab.org>
Cc: Valery Kubarovsky <vpk at jlab.org>
Subject: RICH hardware interlock.

Hi Tyler,
RICH hardware interlock has incorrect titles.
RICH-I is located in sector 4
RICH-II is located in sector 1.
Your title says that RICH-I is located in sector 1.

I prefer to remove old names RICH-I and RICH-II.
We have to call it: RICH in sector 1 and RICH in sector 4.
Shifters don't know what RICh was first and what RICH was second.
They know sector number.

Slow control uses sector based names as well.

Could you please edit GUI?
Thanks,
Valery

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/dsg-hallb_rich/attachments/20220701/3c769d02/attachment.html>