[Eg6_analysis] [Lowq] Meeting tomorrow

Thu Dec 16 14:05:43 EST 2010

Hi Stepan,

Okay, I will keep then the full list of banks as pass0_v1 cooking. But, I
will add to it
the TPCC calibration bank

Since the cooking will include only the 1.2 GeV runs, maybe it's better to
call it
elastic_v1, gem_v1 or pass0_gv1. What do you think?

Best,

Lamiaa

************************************************************
*  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
*  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
*  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
*  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
*  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
*  Newport News, VA. 23606
************************************************************

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>wrote:

>  Hi Lamiaa,
>
> Please cook everything A** and B** files. Week of cooking seems just
> on time before holidays.
> I assume you are talking about IC reconstruction banks. If we keep IC
> information I would prefer to have hodoscope's reconstruction banks
> as well, SCHB and SCPB.
>
> One question, what you will name this pass, Pass0_v2?
>
> Stepan
>
> On 12/16/10 9:42 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>
> Hi Stepan,
>
> For the software, I will leave the two outputs [1] & [3] combined for this
> cooking too.
> However, I will add the helicity modification when Raffaella is done with
> it.
>
> As for 1.2 GeV runs, we have two run periods. First from 61216 till 61482
> with
> 109 production runs. Second set is from 61931 till 61966 with 25 production
> runs.
> So, a total of 134 runs will be processed. Those run numbers is based on
> the list
> of good runs study that I did after the pass0_v1 cooking. Some of these
> runs are
> very long. They contain more than hundred files which means A* and B*
> extension
> on the raw data. Until now I am processing just the A extension, shall I
> add the B files
> also to this cooking? I can expect that this cooking will be done in
> maximum one week
> depends on how much Auger will be busy in this period?
>
> As for the output files, usually I am producing just the SEB NT10 ntuple
> and the BOS
> files when I am cooking to Raphael. But in case some other people might be
> interested
> to analyse these data, I may produce the full list of output files:
>   - ROOT files: CLASTOOL & H2ROOT root ntuples.
>   - SEB Nt10 ntuple.
>   - BOS files
>   - ANAHIST hbook file
>   - Helicity correction file
>   - LOG files
> I will manage to save the SEB ntuple in the claseg6 work disk and copy all
> others files to
> the auto-managed work disk but they will be linked to the claseg6 work
> disk. I will leave the
> IC banks active on those outputs but if there is no objection I may turn
> off the hodoscope
> banks.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lamiaa
>
> ************************************************************
> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
> ************************************************************
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>
>> You can leave changes for DC as they are, no problem.
>> For 1.2 GeV one output [1] will be enough. But if you
>> do not want to touch the code you can leave as it is
>> [1] and [3]. Since this is again mostly for Raphael for
>> the RTPC calibration, we do not want to select events
>> with restriction on a track in RTPC.
>>
>> How long the cooking of 1.2 GeV takes, all the files of
>> all good runs.
>>
>> Thanks, Stepan
>>
>> On 12/15/10 2:46 AM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stepan,
>>
>> Up to now, user_ana codes are up-to-date since we didn't do any changes
>> since
>> the previous cooking except the DC initial fit parameters that I changed
>> to make
>> them similar to dc3. Shall I leave them like that?
>> In the previous cooking we decided to combine
>> - [1] a negatively charged TB track
>> - [3] a positively charged track with at least 2 neutrals (in any EC - IC
>> combinations)
>> in the produced bos file. We turned off the other two outputs:
>> - [2] a good electron and a positively charged particle (I made a change)
>> - [4] at least 1 track in RTPC and at least 2 neutrals in  (any EC - IC
>> combinations)
>>
>> I think last cooking choice is okay for the RTPC calibration since I
>> already used it on
>> some cooking for Raphael, unless you may want to add the RTPC track to
>> this
>> cooking outputs. Please let me know which output configuration shall we
>> use in this
>> cooking.
>>
>> I will wait for the new helicity modification by Raffaella to implement it
>> into our
>> cooking packages. She already contacted me to get the tcl file to run some
>> test
>> after the helicity modification that she did to her cooking codes version.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Lamiaa
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>>
>>> On the meeting today we decided to not wait for IC calibration
>>> and cook 1.2 GeV for Raphael for RTPC work. What we need to
>>> do is to make sure code is up to date. Raffaella mentioned that
>>> she can add helicity calculations into it within this week. For
>>> 1.2 GeV we do not need any output but electron events.
>>> Let's work towards having everything ready for 1.2 GeV cooking,
>>> all of the good runs, by the end of the week. Let me know what
>>> we are missing and what we need to accomplish this goal.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Stepan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/13/10 9:49 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>
>>> Sure we can talk about that whenever you want. Please let me know when
>>> it's convenient for you and I will call you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lamiaa
>>>
>>> ************************************************************
>>> *  Lamiaa El Fassi             email: elfassi at jlab.org
>>> *  Research Associate @ Rutgers University
>>> *  Phone: (757) 269-7011 // Fax: (757) 269-5703
>>> *  Jefferson Lab., 12000 Jefferson Ave.
>>> *  Suite# 4, MS 12H3
>>> *  Newport News, VA. 23606
>>> ************************************************************
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi Lamiaa,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the email. Sorry we did not cross today. I am
>>>> on "vacation" but I come for few meetings.
>>>>
>>>> One thing I wanted to talk to you is the preparation of the
>>>> software for the next cooking, including outputs. I guess
>>>> we can do it offline.
>>>>
>>>> Have a safe flight.
>>>>
>>>> Stepan
>>>>
>>>> On 12/13/10 6:10 PM, Lamiaa El Fassi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Stepan,
>>>>
>>>> I was willing to stop by to talk to you today but I didn't have a chance
>>>> to do so and it seems you are on vacation. I am leaving tomorrow morning and
>>>> I am not able to attend the meeting since my flight is on the same meeting
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Lamiaa
>>>>
>>>> *Sent from my MOTOBLUR™ smartphone on AT&T*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original message-----
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Stepan Stepanyan <stepanya at jlab.org> <stepanya at jlab.org>*
>>>> To: *eg6_analysis at jlab.org, lowq at jlab.org*
>>>> Sent: *Mon, Dec 13, 2010 16:50:34 GMT+00:00*
>>>> Subject: *[Lowq] Meeting tomorrow
>>>>
>>>>  Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> We will have eg6 meeting tomorrow Tuesday, December 14, at 9:30am
>>>> in room B101.
>>>> Agenda items can be found at -
>>>>
>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Meeting_on_December_14_at_9:30am
>>>>
>>>> Calling instructions can be found at :
>>>>
>>>> http://clasweb.jlab.org/rungroups/lowq/wiki/index.php/Agendas_and_Minutes_of_the_meetings
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Stepan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lowq mailing list
>>>> Lowq at jlab.org
>>>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lowq
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/eg6_analysis/attachments/20101216/eba92c5f/attachment.html 